What is meant by small oscillations for this potential energy function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of small oscillations around stable equilibrium points in a potential energy function. It establishes that the force on a particle is derived from the potential energy function, leading to three equilibrium points, including one at x=0. The Taylor approximation of the force near these points reveals that the linear term resembles Hooke's law, indicating harmonic motion for small oscillations. The condition for small oscillations requires that higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion remain negligible compared to the linear term. The analysis concludes that while x=0 is a local maximum of the potential, it serves as a semi-stable equilibrium, with the other two points exhibiting different stability characteristics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
A particle of mass ##m## moves on the ##x##-axis with potential energy

$$V(x)=\frac{E_0}{a^4}x^4+4ax^3-8a^2x^2$$
Relevant Equations
a) Find the positions at which the particle is in stable equilibrium.

b) Find the angular frequency of small oscillations about each stable equilibrium position.

c) What do you mean by small oscillations? Be quantitative and give a separate answer for each point of stable equilibrium.
The force on the particle is

$$F(x)=-V'(x)$$

By equating this to zero we find points of stable equilibrium. There are three such points

$$x=0$$

$$x=a^3\left ( \frac{-3a^2\pm\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}}{2E_0} \right )$$

Next we use a Taylor approximation to ##F##.

$$F(x+\Delta x) \approx F(x)+F'(x)\Delta x+\frac{F''(x)}{2}(\Delta x)^2$$

$$=-V'(x)-V''(x)\Delta x-\frac{V'''(x)}{2}(\Delta x)^2$$

We can then evaluate this Taylor approximations near each of the three points of equilibrium.

Near ##x=0## we get

$$F(\Delta x)\approx 16a^2\Delta x-24a(\Delta x)^2$$

Near the other two points of equilibrium we get

$$F(x_0+\Delta x)\approx -\frac{18a^6\pm6a^4\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}+32E_0a^2}{E_0}\Delta x-\frac{-12a^2\pm 12\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}}{a}(\Delta x)^2$$

For each of these three cases, if we only consider the linear term in the Taylor approximation, then the functional form of ##F## in the approximation is that of Hooke's law.

In the first case, with ##k=0## and in the other two cases with ##k=\frac{18a^6\pm6a^4\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}+32E_0a^2}{E_0}##.

The angular frequencies of oscillation near each of these equilibrium points are then given by ##\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}##.

This approximation is, apparently, only good for small oscillations. My question is about item (c) in the original problem: what do we mean by small oscillations?

It seems that we need the quadratic term in the Taylor approximation and all subsequent terms to be small compared to the first order term.

In the book I am reading, Georgi's "The Physics of Waves", it seems we must have

1720281440455.png


However, I don't quite totally understand the condition 1.25 above (and have asked about it before).

How do we apply this condition in the current problem. For example, for the equilibrium point ##x=0## we have ##V'''(0)=24a## and so ##|xV'''(0)|=|24xa|##. We also have ##V''(0)=-16a^2##.

Thus it seems that for ##x## near 0, ##|xV'''(0|## approaches zero and so is much smaller than ##|V''(0)|##.

Similarly, ##V^{(4)}(x)=\frac{24E_0}{a^4}## and ##|xV^{(4)}(0)|=\left | \frac{24E_0x}{a^4}\right | << |24a|=|V'''(0)|## for small ##x##.

All subsequent terms in the Taylor approximation are zero.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
By equating this to zero we find points of stable equilibrium.
The equilibrium is not necessarily stable when the first derivative of the potential function is zero. Setting the derivative eequal to zero finds the extrema, local maxima or minima. You can (a) evaluate the second derivative at the points where the first vanishes or (b) plot the function and see for yourself.
 
$$V''(0)=-16a^2$$

Thus, ##0## is a local max of the potential and a local min of the force on the particle.

If we move away from ##0## into a positive ##x## then the force tends to take the particle farther away from ##0##. If we move into a negative ##x## then it seems the force restores the particle to ##0##. Thus, ##0## is a semi-stable equilibrium?

For the other two points with zero derivative, the second derivative at those points are parameterized expressions as can be seen below

1720283056019.png
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top