- #1
etotheipi
I see this sort of wording a lot, for instance, we might say that the block is on the point of slipping or the ball is on the point of leaving the surface of the hill. My guess is that it's to do with constraint forces; that is, at the exact point where the constraint forces acting on a body can no longer constrain the motion of the body (perhaps because static friction has reached ##\mu N## or the normal contact force has reduced to zero), we say the body is on the point of doing something.
For instance, if a ball is rolling down a hill, there exists a normal contact constraint force (satisfying ##N \geqslant 0##) which adjusts its magnitude so that the ball remains on the surface - the constrained motion. But when this force reaches ##N=0##, if the velocity of the ball increases by ##dv## the normal force according to the constrained model would become negative - which evidently can't occur.
So my conclusion was that generally we write the equations of motion for the constrained motion (i.e. at rest, moving in a circle of fixed radius, moving with a platform etc.), and then substitute in the limiting case of a constraint force to solve for the conditions when the motion becomes unconstrained. Is this what is meant when we say something is on the point of e.g. slipping/toppling etc.?
I tried searching for references but the only mentions of constraint forces I could find were in the context of Lagrangian dynamics and other higher level mechanics. I don't know if the usage in that context is similar to what I've said above.
For instance, if a ball is rolling down a hill, there exists a normal contact constraint force (satisfying ##N \geqslant 0##) which adjusts its magnitude so that the ball remains on the surface - the constrained motion. But when this force reaches ##N=0##, if the velocity of the ball increases by ##dv## the normal force according to the constrained model would become negative - which evidently can't occur.
So my conclusion was that generally we write the equations of motion for the constrained motion (i.e. at rest, moving in a circle of fixed radius, moving with a platform etc.), and then substitute in the limiting case of a constraint force to solve for the conditions when the motion becomes unconstrained. Is this what is meant when we say something is on the point of e.g. slipping/toppling etc.?
I tried searching for references but the only mentions of constraint forces I could find were in the context of Lagrangian dynamics and other higher level mechanics. I don't know if the usage in that context is similar to what I've said above.