- #1
david findley
- 23
- 0
--I understand that the original basis of string theory was as explanation for the ontological origin quanta .
I have a few questions:
1) What is the origin and material make-up of the string? (How can we avoid the metaphysical pit-fall of an infinite regress in regards the ontological origins of fundamental elements?)
2) How is Space and Time defined ?
3) How do strings relate to the Big Bang ?
Thank you =)
(Edit)
It is also important to make a logical analysis of string theory:
An argument is only logically valid and sound if the conclusions follow from true premises. Premises in string theory are indefinitive . Therefore, until string theory can come to definitive conclusions regarding such basic elements as Space and Time, (and even its own ontology,) then all of the conclusions stemming therefrom are both invalid and unsound.
I would like to inquire into the possibility that the plausability of string theory has been grossly exaggerated by inventive mathematics and popular culture. Further, it seems that logically baseless introductions (ie 'gravitons',) have rendered the the general theory absolutely ridiculous--
if that which is strictly illogical may be considered 'ridiculous'.
I have a few questions:
1) What is the origin and material make-up of the string? (How can we avoid the metaphysical pit-fall of an infinite regress in regards the ontological origins of fundamental elements?)
2) How is Space and Time defined ?
3) How do strings relate to the Big Bang ?
Thank you =)
(Edit)
It is also important to make a logical analysis of string theory:
An argument is only logically valid and sound if the conclusions follow from true premises. Premises in string theory are indefinitive . Therefore, until string theory can come to definitive conclusions regarding such basic elements as Space and Time, (and even its own ontology,) then all of the conclusions stemming therefrom are both invalid and unsound.
I would like to inquire into the possibility that the plausability of string theory has been grossly exaggerated by inventive mathematics and popular culture. Further, it seems that logically baseless introductions (ie 'gravitons',) have rendered the the general theory absolutely ridiculous--
if that which is strictly illogical may be considered 'ridiculous'.
Last edited: