What is the 4-momentum of a particle with given rest mass and speed?

  • Thread starter Newtons Balls
  • Start date
  • Tags
    4-momentum
I'll double check that questionAnyway, just did the calculation quickly and I get 0.5c, which sounds reasonable.But remember, you're supposed to useIn summary, the 4-momentum of a particle with a speed of light denoted by c is given by P^{u} = c(2\sqrt{2} ,1,0,-1). Using the relativistic relation between energy E, rest mass m, and momentum p, m^{2}=E^{2}-p^{2}, the rest mass, energy, speed, and kinetic energy of the particle can be calculated. The rest mass is 2\sqrt{2}c, the energy is 2\sqrt{2}
  • #1
Newtons Balls
20
0

Homework Statement


A particle has 4-momentum:
P[tex]^{u} [/tex] = c(2[tex]\sqrt{2} [/tex],1,0,-1)
Where c denotes the speed of light.
Calculate the particle's rest mass m, its energy E, its speed v and its kinetic energy T.

Homework Equations



Well the relativistic relation between E, m and p is:
[tex]m^{2}[/tex] = [tex]E^{2}[/tex] - [tex]p^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I know this is meant to be really easy but this 4-momentum stuff is confusing me rather allot :/

The notation I've seen in my textbook indicates the 4th component should be the temporal component. The textbook also seems to indicate that the temporal component is equal to mc and E/c. This would give negative energy and negative mass, which I don't think is correct- am I misunderstanding what the textbook is saying?

After doing a bit of reading I've seen things saying that the 4-momentum inner producted with itself is related to the rest mass of the particle like this:
[tex]-|p|^{2}=m^{2}c^{2} [/tex]

1) is this relationship correct?
2) I haven't actually managed to find anything explicitly saying what the inner product in Mikowski space is, would it be the standard dot product still?
3) if the relationship is correct do I use all four components in this dot product or just the first three?

I'm a bit rubbish at this stuff, I'm trying to teach myself the course from a textbook and whilst its quite good at explaining the kinematic aspects I'm having trouble following it when it gets onto mass/energy relationships...

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
i see no c …

Hi Newtons Balls! :smile:
Newtons Balls said:
A particle has 4-momentum:
P[tex]^{u} [/tex] = 2([tex]\sqrt{2} [/tex],1,0,-1)
Where c denotes the speed of light.

erm … what c? :confused:
The notation I've seen in my textbook indicates the 4th component should be the temporal component. The textbook also seems to indicate that the temporal component is equal to mc and E/c. This would give negative energy and negative mass, which I don't think is correct- am I misunderstanding what the textbook is saying?

Yes … some books use the 4th, and some the 1st.

This question means the 1st.

But you seem to have copied it wrong anyway …

do you mean c(√2,1,0,-1)?
 
  • #3
yes, sorry I meant c in front of the bracket, not the 2. I'll edit that now!

Thanks for clarifying the notation :)
 
  • #4
If the 1st part of the 4-momentum in this case is the temporal component, is the other part of the textbook correct in saying this part is = E/C and mc? and does this m refer to proper mass or relativistic mass? its not at all clear :/

If it does refer to proper mass then this would mean the proper mass is 2[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]. However if you inner product the entire 4-momentum with itself as I read elsewhere, which should result in [tex]-m^{2}[/tex][tex]c^{2}[/tex], this leads to a mass of [tex]\sqrt{10}[/tex]. I'm guessing one of the masses is relativistic? Also I'm not sure what the negative sign is about ^_^

This would all be wrong, of course, if the dot product is not an inner product of Mikowski space...
 
  • #5
Newtons Balls said:

Homework Equations



Well the relativistic relation between E, m and p is:
[tex]m^{2}[/tex] = [tex]E^{2}[/tex] - [tex]p^{2}[/tex]

(btw, you don't have to keep writing tex … you can put = and - in the middle of a tex expression)

This is the correct equation.

Why didn't you use it?
Newtons Balls said:
However if you inner product the entire 4-momentum with itself as I read elsewhere, which should result in [tex]-m^{2}[/tex][tex]c^{2}[/tex], this leads to a mass of [tex]\sqrt{10}[/tex]

However did you get √10?

[tex](t,x,y,z)^2 = t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2[/tex]

Start again. :smile:
 
  • #6
Thanks.

The reason I didn't use it yet is I don't know E yet.
My textbook did mention that the temporal component is = E/c, is this correct?
If that is true then [tex]E=2\sqrt{2}c^{2}[/tex]
and I can go on and (hopefully) do the rest...
 
  • #7
… the clue's in the name …

Newtons Balls said:
A particle has 4-momentum:
P[tex]^{u} [/tex] = c(2[tex]\sqrt{2} [/tex],1,0,-1)
Where c denotes the speed of light.

The reason why it's called the 4-momentum is because that's what it is … three bits are the momentum, p, and the other bit is the energy, E.

So E = 2√2 c and p= (c,0,-c). :smile:
 
  • #8
Thanks.

So [tex]E=2\sqrt{2}c, p=\sqrt{2}c, m=\sqrt{6}c[/tex]?

I really hope I've finally got this :P
 
  • #9
Newtons Balls said:
Thanks.

So [tex]E=2\sqrt{2}c, p=\sqrt{2}c, m=\sqrt{6}c[/tex]?

I really hope I've finally got this :P

That's fine. :smile:

Now what are the speed and the KE?
 
  • #10
Well for v:
[tex]p=mv\gamma[/tex]?

Unfortunately that doesn't rearrange reasonably... is that equation wrong or am I being an idiot with my re-arranging? ^_^
 
  • #11
Newtons Balls said:
[tex]p=mv\gamma[/tex]

Good. :smile:

And similarly, E = … ?
 
  • #12
[tex]E=c^{2}m\gamma[/tex]?

Or you mean T?

[tex]T=E - c^{2}m[/tex]?

I assume you mean use the E equation to work out v, then minus that from E to work out T?
 
  • #13
Newtons Balls said:
I assume you mean use the E equation to work out v, then minus that from E to work out T?

That's right! So v = … ? :smile:
[tex]E=c^{2}m\gamma[/tex]?

hmm … I was actually expecting just [tex]E\ =\ m\gamma[/tex] …

I wonder whether I'm using the wrong units? :confused:
 
  • #14
Hmm. No I think you're right about not needing the [tex]c^{2}[/tex]. I keep referring to this textbook and it doesn't use natural units. :(
 
  • #15
Anyway, just did the calculation quickly and I get 0.5c, which sounds reasonable.
And I got T=[tex]\sqrt8-\sqrt6[/tex]c.. whatever that is. Sound right?
 
  • #16
Newtons Balls said:
Hmm. No I think you're right about not needing the [tex]c^{2}[/tex]. I keep referring to this textbook and it doesn't use natural units. :(

hmm … not a good idea to use different books …

Relativity is notoriously a subject where there are different conventions.

Stick to whatever your professors use, or you'll get confused and risk misunderstanding questions in your exams.
Newtons Balls said:
Anyway, just did the calculation quickly and I get 0.5c, which sounds reasonable.

I don't like the sound of that …

you're supposed to say something like [tex]p\ =\ mv\,\gamma\ \ E\ =\ m\,\gamma[/tex]

so v = p/E,

which in this case is √2/2√2, = 0.5c (uh … where did that c come from? :confused:)

oh … are you sure the original question wasn't (√2c,1,0,-1)?

That would look much better dimensionally. :smile:
 
  • #17
Its definitely [tex]c(2\sqrt2,1,0,-1)[/tex]

And as for the textbook, it is the recommended text for the module. I haven't sat the module which explains my nubbishness. Long story short I have to teach myself this module over the summer for next year :( The textbook isn't very good for self learning though it seems. Kinematics and all the other stuff seemed to work okay, but I can't get my head around this 4-momentum/energy/mass related stuff.

So...as for this velocity thing: you're saying its just... 0.5 with no c? that does sound a little odd ^_^
 
  • #18
Newtons Balls said:
Its definitely [tex]c(2\sqrt2,1,0,-1)[/tex]

And as for the textbook, it is the recommended text for the module. I haven't sat the module which explains my nubbishness. Long story short I have to teach myself this module over the summer for next year :( The textbook isn't very good for self learning though it seems. Kinematics and all the other stuff seemed to work okay, but I can't get my head around this 4-momentum/energy/mass related stuff.

So...as for this velocity thing: you're saying its just... 0.5 with no c? that does sound a little odd ^_^

No … it must have a c in it.

Which is why, on thinking about it, I expected the 4-momentum to have a c in the t position.

I learned relativity with units so that c = 1, so I never had to bother with factors of c.

Clearly some of the equations I'm familiar with have an extra c or c2 with your units. :confused:
 
  • #19
*groan*

I've just been trying to sort out the units.

Doesn't the initial relativistic equation mean P and E must be dimensionally the same?

[tex] m^{2} = E^{2} - p^{2} [/tex]

Then how can the velocity be E/p, as that would make it dimensionless?
 
  • #20
Newtons Balls said:
*groan*

I've just been trying to sort out the units.

Doesn't the initial relativistic equation mean P and E must be dimensionally the same?

[tex] m^{2} = E^{2} - p^{2} [/tex]

Then how can the velocity be E/p, as that would make it dimensionless?

You're supposed to be supplying us with the equations!

[tex] m^{2} = E^{2} - p^{2} [/tex] looks to me like a c = 1 equation.

It doesn't seem to fit the units in the rest of your problem.

btw, in space-time, velocity is dimensionless (space and time have the same dimensions) with c = 1 units.
 
  • #21
I found that equation on the interwebs because part a of the question is to state the relativistic relationship between Mass, Energy and Momentum and I can't find anything with all three in this textbook.

The best I can find in the book is this:
[tex]c^{2}m^{2} - p^{2} = c^{2}m0^{2}[/tex]
I reckon m0 is the proper mass and m is the relativistic mass, but that would make the first term equal to Energy anyway? Which would make it the same as the equation I found on the web...

Edit: Oops, apart from a c^2 term. lol. Okay, thanks, that would explain that...
 
  • #22
Newtons Balls said:
I found that equation on the interwebs …

As I said before :rolleyes::
tiny-tim said:
hmm … not a good idea to use different books …

Relativity is notoriously a subject where there are different conventions.

Stick to whatever your professors use, or you'll get confused and risk misunderstanding questions in your exams.

[tex]c^{2}m^{2} - p^{2} = c^{2}m0^{2}[/tex]

and

[tex]m^{2}[/tex] = [tex]E^{2}[/tex] - [tex]p^{2}[/tex]

are both perfectly good equations, but you have to choose the right one for the units you're using.

It's no good ferreting around the web for relativity equations that won't agree with your own book.
The best I can find in the book is this:
[tex]c^{2}m^{2} - p^{2} = c^{2}m0^{2}[/tex]
I reckon m0 is the proper mass and m is the relativistic mass, but that would make the first term equal to Energy anyway? Which would make it the same as the equation I found on the web...

Edit: Oops, apart from a c^2 term. lol. Okay, thanks, that would explain that...

Yes, you seem to have got it now …

so the equation relating E p and v is … ? :smile:
 
  • #23
[tex]E=m \gamma c^{2}[/tex]
[tex]P=mv\gamma[/tex]
So:
[tex]v=c^{2}P/E[/tex]

Right?
 
  • #24
Newtons Balls said:
[tex]E=m \gamma c^{2}[/tex]
[tex]P=mv\gamma[/tex]
So:
[tex]v=c^{2}P/E[/tex]

Right?

Yes … those equations make sense at last! :smile:

Going to bed now … :zzz:
 
  • #25
lol. Thanks so much for your help :D I owe you a pint of e-beer :)
 
  • #26
mmm …

mmm …

:-p :-p e-beer! :-p :-p
 

FAQ: What is the 4-momentum of a particle with given rest mass and speed?

1. What is 4-momentum?

4-momentum is a concept in physics that describes the energy and momentum of a particle in a four-dimensional space-time. It combines the traditional three-dimensional momentum with the energy of the particle, taking into account the effects of special relativity.

2. How is 4-momentum related to rest mass and speed?

The 4-momentum of a particle is directly related to its rest mass and speed. The rest mass of a particle is a measure of its intrinsic energy, and the speed determines the particle's momentum. The 4-momentum is a combination of these two quantities, representing the total energy and momentum of the particle in four-dimensional space-time.

3. How is 4-momentum calculated?

The 4-momentum of a particle is calculated by multiplying the rest mass by the four-velocity, which is a vector representing the particle's speed and direction in four-dimensional space-time. This calculation takes into account the effects of special relativity and results in a four-dimensional vector with energy as the time component and momentum as the spatial components.

4. Why is 4-momentum important in physics?

4-momentum is important in physics because it is a fundamental concept that unifies energy and momentum in the context of special relativity. It is also a conserved quantity, meaning that it remains constant in any closed system, making it a useful tool for analyzing particle interactions and reactions.

5. How does 4-momentum change in different reference frames?

In special relativity, 4-momentum is a relativistic quantity, meaning that it changes depending on the observer's reference frame. This is due to the effects of time dilation and length contraction, which alter the measurements of energy and momentum for an observer moving at a different speed. However, the magnitude of the 4-momentum remains constant in all reference frames, reflecting the principle of conservation of energy and momentum.

Back
Top