What is the contradiction in integrating around a contour with a branch cut?

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of a branch cut in complex analysis, specifically for functions like lnz. It explains the need to restrict theta to be between 0 and 2Pi, but never equal to 2Pi to ensure the function remains single valued. The conversation also mentions integrating around a contour, using a "keyhole" contour to avoid the real axis and resolve any concerns about the chosen branch cut.
  • #1
sachi
75
1
In complex analysis we say that for fn's like lnz we apply a branch cut along positive x-axis to make sure it's single valued. i.e restrict theta s.t 0<=theta<2Pi but we never allow theta to equal 2Pi as this would make lnz take on 2nd value.
Let us integrate around a contour which goes from origin to x= infinity, then goes anticlockwise around a circle of infinite radius back to the positive x-axis at plus infinity, then we go back to the origin along the x-axis, and then go clockwise around a circle of zero radius, hence avoiding crossing the branch cut. we say that theta = 0 as we go from the origin out to x=infinity, and then we have to say (in order to get the answer right) that theta = 2pi when we go from x-infinity back to the origin. But surely this is a contradiction, since we assumed that theta could not equal 2 Pi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sachi said:
In complex analysis we say that for fn's like lnz we apply a branch cut along positive x-axis to make sure it's single valued. i.e restrict theta s.t 0<=theta<2Pi but we never allow theta to equal 2Pi as this would make lnz take on 2nd value.
Let us integrate around a contour which goes from origin to x= infinity, then goes anticlockwise around a circle of infinite radius back to the positive x-axis at plus infinity, then we go back to the origin along the x-axis, and then go clockwise around a circle of zero radius, hence avoiding crossing the branch cut. we say that theta = 0 as we go from the origin out to x=infinity, and then we have to say (in order to get the answer right) that theta = 2pi when we go from x-infinity back to the origin. But surely this is a contradiction, since we assumed that theta could not equal 2 Pi?

Can you better describe this contour?

Try not to lump everything you say in one sentence or even paragraph.
 
  • #3
You are never integrating over circles with "infinite" or "zero" radius. Your contours are compact and avoid the origin.

You can use a "keyhole" contour to avoid the real axis and clear up your concerns (see diagram near the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_calculus ). The horizontal segments lie strictly above and below the positive real axis, and get closer and closer to it as your contour grows. As this segment below the real axis is approaching it, the argument of log is going to 2*Pi and the integral over this segment will approach the integral over the real axis of this different choice of branch cut.
 

Related to What is the contradiction in integrating around a contour with a branch cut?

1. What is a branch cut contradiction?

A branch cut contradiction is a situation in mathematics where there is a contradiction between the existence of a branch cut and the existence of a continuous function. A branch cut is a line or curve on a complex plane where a function is not defined, while a continuous function is one that can be drawn without lifting your pen from the paper. In some cases, these two concepts cannot coexist and lead to a contradiction.

2. How does a branch cut contradiction occur?

A branch cut contradiction typically occurs when trying to define a multivalued function, such as the logarithm or square root, on a complex plane. These functions require a branch cut to be defined, but this branch cut can lead to a contradiction when trying to make the function continuous. This is because the branch cut creates a discontinuity in the function, making it impossible for it to be drawn without lifting your pen from the paper.

3. What are the implications of a branch cut contradiction?

A branch cut contradiction can have significant implications in mathematics, as it challenges the fundamental concept of continuity. It can also limit the use of certain multivalued functions, as they may not be able to be defined on certain complex planes due to the presence of a branch cut contradiction.

4. Can a branch cut contradiction be resolved?

In most cases, a branch cut contradiction cannot be resolved without changing the definition of the function or the complex plane on which it is defined. Some mathematicians have proposed alternative ways to define multivalued functions that avoid branch cut contradictions, but these are still under debate and not widely accepted.

5. How does a branch cut contradiction impact real-world applications?

While a branch cut contradiction may seem like a purely theoretical concept, it does have implications in real-world applications. For example, in physics, multivalued functions are often used to describe physical phenomena, and a branch cut contradiction can limit their use and accuracy. It is important for scientists and mathematicians to continue exploring and understanding branch cut contradictions to improve our understanding of the world around us.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top