What is the definition of supremum and how does it relate to set A?

In summary, the definition of supremum states that if S is the supremum of a set A, then it must be greater than or equal to all elements in A and must be the smallest of all upper bounds. In the given example, the set A is defined as {1,2,3,4,5} and the number 5 is the supremum. Condition (a) is satisfied but (b) is not, as there is no x_0 in the set A such that 5 - 0.1 < x_0. However, this does not change the fact that 5 is still the supremum of the set A.
  • #1
lukaszh
32
0
Hello,
I found the definition. If S is supremum of set A, then
a) [tex]\forall x\in A:x\leq S[/tex]
b) [tex]\forall\varepsilon>0\;\exists x_0\in A:S-\varepsilon<x_0[/tex]

Now let define set [tex]A=\{1,2,3,4,5\}[/tex]. Is number 5 supremum of set A? Condition a) is satisfied, but b) is problem. If [tex]\varepsilon=0.1[/tex], there isn't x_0 in the set A such that
[tex]5-0.1<x_0[/tex]

Could you explain that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


What's wrong with x_0=5 ?
 
  • #3


As quasar said above, x0 is chosen to be 5.

The supremum of a finite set is always the same as the maximum of that set. The supremum, in a sense, can be thought of as a generalization of the idea of maximum.
 
  • #4


The supremum of a set is either an element of the set or a limit that the elements tend to. Of course in this finite set the supremum is going to be an element of the set.
 
  • #5


lukaszh said:
Hello,
I found the definition. If S is supremum of set A, then
a) [tex]\forall x\in A:x\leq S[/tex]
b) [tex]\forall\varepsilon>0\;\exists x_0\in A:S-\varepsilon<x_0[/tex]

Now let define set [tex]A=\{1,2,3,4,5\}[/tex]. Is number 5 supremum of set A? Condition a) is satisfied, but b) is problem. If [tex]\varepsilon=0.1[/tex], there isn't x_0 in the set A such that
[tex]5-0.1<x_0[/tex]

Could you explain that?
The explanation is that the definition you give is wrong. (a) is the definition of "upper bound". In order that an upper bound be a "supremum" (also called "least upper bound") it must be the smallest of all upper bounds. In this case, every number less than or equal to 5 is an upper bound so 5 is the "least upper bound" or "supremum".
 
  • #6


Halls, the definition consists of both parts (a) and (b). (a) says that it's an upper bound. (b) says that it's the least such upper bound (notice that (b) doesn't make S an upper bound by itself)
 
  • #7


But the whole point is that, while if (a) and (b) are both true, then S is a supremum, it can happen, as in the example given here, that a number is a supremum without (b) being true.
 

FAQ: What is the definition of supremum and how does it relate to set A?

What is the definition of supremum?

The supremum of a set A is the least upper bound of the set, meaning it is the smallest number that is greater than or equal to all elements in the set.

How is supremum different from maximum?

The supremum of a set does not necessarily have to be an element of the set itself, whereas the maximum must be an element of the set. Additionally, a set may have multiple maximums, but it can only have one supremum.

Can a set have more than one supremum?

No, a set can only have one supremum. This is because the supremum is defined as the least upper bound, so if there were multiple supremums, it would contradict the definition.

Is the supremum of a set always unique?

Yes, the supremum of a set is always unique. This is because the supremum is defined as the least upper bound, so if there were multiple numbers that were equal to the supremum, they would all be considered upper bounds and contradict the definition.

How is supremum related to limit?

The supremum is related to limit in that the limit of a sequence is the supremum of the set of all numbers in the sequence. This means that the supremum is the largest possible value that the sequence can approach, but it may not necessarily be an element of the sequence itself.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top