- #36
dreimd
- 10
- 0
I hate to see posts go back and forth just quoting each other as it gets petty, hard to read and discourages others from contributing so I will keep it minimal.
What? You actually haven't linked anything. The one thing you tried to was broken. When I fixed it, I got a paper on how we should augment our teaching of heat with entropy.
Actually this convo started out with you saying 'adding heat' or 'adding cold' are two ways of looking at the same exact thing' so even there, you're using heat as a noun.
But fine even only taking heat in the context of a process, my original point is that there is no actual physical process cold transfer, you are always heating something. Right you could look at it as cooling, but it would be like saying someone who grew 2 inches actually shrunk negative 2 inches. You'd get the same results, but that's not what's actually happening in the physical world.
lennybogzy said:debatable, please see the multiple links I’ve posted illustrating that this is layman’s definition
What? You actually haven't linked anything. The one thing you tried to was broken. When I fixed it, I got a paper on how we should augment our teaching of heat with entropy.
lennybogzy said:What’s more the conversation started off with both of us assuming heat was not a thermal energy but a process. If that’s the case it’s equivalent in every sense with cold as a process.
Actually this convo started out with you saying 'adding heat' or 'adding cold' are two ways of looking at the same exact thing' so even there, you're using heat as a noun.
But fine even only taking heat in the context of a process, my original point is that there is no actual physical process cold transfer, you are always heating something. Right you could look at it as cooling, but it would be like saying someone who grew 2 inches actually shrunk negative 2 inches. You'd get the same results, but that's not what's actually happening in the physical world.