MHB What is the difference between log and ln?

AI Thread Summary
The difference between "log" and "ln" primarily lies in their bases: "ln(x)" denotes the natural logarithm with base e, while "log(x)" can refer to either base 10 or base e, depending on the context. In pre-calculus and elementary calculus, "log(x)" typically represents the logarithm base 10, whereas in higher-level mathematics, it often signifies the natural logarithm. In computer science, "log(x)" frequently refers to logarithm base 2. The differentiation rules for these logarithms also differ, with "ln(x)" having a simpler derivative compared to "log_{10}(x)." Understanding the context is crucial for correctly interpreting the notation used.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
In simple words, what is the difference between log and ln?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In one notational convention:

$$\ln(x)=\log_{e}(x)$$

$$\log(x)=\log_{10}(x)$$

This is typically what you see in pre-calculus and elementary calculus courses.

In another convention:

$$\log(x)=\log_{e}(x)$$

This is what you'll find at W|A (but it will recognize ln as well). When you get into analysis, this is what you'll likely find used there.

In computer science, you may see:

$$\log(x)=\log_{2}(x)$$

So, it really depends on the context...and the notation "log" often means the most commonly used base in that particular environment.
 
MarkFL said:
In one notational convention:

$$\ln(x)=\log_{e}(x)$$

$$\log(x)=\log_{10}(x)$$

This is typically what you see in pre-calculus and elementary calculus courses.

In another convention:

$$\log(x)=\log_{e}(x)$$

This is what you'll find at W|A (but it will recognize ln as well). When you get into analysis, this is what you'll likely find used there.

In computer science, you may see:

$$\log(x)=\log_{2}(x)$$

So, it really depends on the context...and the notation "log" often means the most commonly used base in that particular environment.

Good information.
 
The reason why "[math]\log(x)= \ln(x)[/math]" in higher courses (calculus and beyond) and "[math]\log_{10}(x)[/math]" is just dropped is that [math]\ln(x)[/math] satisfies the simple differentiation rule [math]\frac{d\ln(x)}{dx}= \frac{1}{x}[/math] while if the base is 10, [math]\frac{d \log_{10}(x)}{dx}= \frac{1}{\ln(10)x}[/math].
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Back
Top