I What Is the Difference Between Loss and Cost Functions in Quantum Computing?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter SaschaSIGI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cost function Loss
SaschaSIGI
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Im currently hearing a module about quantum computing and Im wondering what is the difference of a loss and cost function for variational quantum algortihms? Both functions also can be presented into a loss/cost landscape? Are they the same ?

Already a big thank you for all the upcoming answers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and :welcome: !

No answers in three weeks, so there must be something missing in this post.
Perhaps you can provide some context, examples, references ? Be more specific ?

Would be good to read the guidelines even though this isn't homework.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
No answers in three weeks, so there must be something missing in this post.
Perhaps you can provide some context, examples, references ? Be more specific ?
I don't think so, the problem is rather that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_function and other sources write
a loss function or cost function (sometimes also called an error function)
And even so there is the feeling that they really are used for the same thing but in slightly different contexts, it is hard to pin this down.
 
I always treat loss/cost/objective function as synonyms until a reference uses both and gives a definition of both that clarifies the distinction.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top