What is the Effect of Dimpled Surfaces on Rolling Friction?

In summary: actually measuring the net force...net force is the force exerted on a body when it is in motion, while friction is the force that opposes the motion.net force is the force exerted on a body when it is in motion, while friction is the force that opposes the motion.
  • #1
Meggett
7
0
Hi. I am doing an experiment on golf balls. I know that the dimples are supposed to reduce the resistance when traveling through the air. I am testing the effects that dimples have on rolling resistance when on the ground.
I am using 3 golf balls of the same type/brand.
One, I am keeping it how it came (new, with dimples). The second I have filed HALF of the dimples off (then sanded that half to make it smooth). The third I have filed all the dimples off and sanded it to make it smooth. I have constructed a pendulum with a sinker on the end so that I can pull it back a set distance so it should hit the ball with the same force every time. This will keep the experiment controlled (every single time the ball should have the same initial velocity - I think...). I am going to conduct the experiment on a smooth concrete surface.

The only things I can think of to measure is:
1. The time to taken to stop rolling
2. The distance travelled.

I am stuck on how to prove the friction part of things. Like, what formulas should I use??

i know the formula:
Friction force = coefficient of friction x normal force

except i don't know how to find the coefficient of friction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Hi Meggett! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Meggett said:
The second I have filed HALF of the dimples off (then sanded that half to make it smooth). The third I have filed all the dimples off and sanded it to make it smooth. I have constructed a pendulum with a sinker on the end so that I can pull it back a set distance so it should hit the ball with the same force every time. This will keep the experiment controlled (every single time the ball should have the same initial velocity - I think...). I am going to conduct the experiment on a smooth concrete surface.

But your 3 balls have different masses … so they won't have the same initial speed. :redface:

You'll need to compare the accelerations … why not use a sloping surface, or maybe the inside of a bowl? :smile:
 
  • #3
oh... thanks!
so if i use an inclined plane i can place the ball at the same spot each time, and release without using any force...
is: [a = g x sin theta] the right equation to use to find acceleration?

but then how would i find the friction?
 
  • #4
With friction, a = g x sin theta - F/m.

You're probably going to do something along the lines of finding the time taken to roll down a certain distance, then using kinematics equations to work out acceleration, and hence friction.
 
  • #5
Meggett said:
is: [a = g x sin theta] the right equation to use to find acceleration?

but then how would i find the friction?

No wait... if i use that equation, won't it be the same for each ball..?
can i use [s = ut + 1/2 at^2] for inclined planes, or is that just for flat surfaces?
 
  • #6
Meggett said:
No wait... if i use that equation, won't it be the same for each ball..?
can i use [s = ut + 1/2 at^2] for inclined planes, or is that just for flat surfaces?

That would apply to any movement under constant acceleration.
But it's irrelevant since your acceleration will be the sum of two other accelerations. The acceleration brought on by the gravitational force [tex]g\sin{\theta}[/tex] and a second one, in the direction opposite the velocity, [tex]\frac{F_{friction}}{m}[/tex]

You'll have to make a few key assumptions and a few key observations in order for the experiment to be useful.

For instance, you'll have to neglect air resistance (Which isn't that big of a crime, considering the velocities you'll be dealing with) and you'll have to take note of rolling versus sliding for each of the balls, since the models you'll be using for the consuming forces would have to be different (Kinetic friction as opposed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance" ).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
cool thanks for your help so far...

ok so I've got:
a = (g*sin theta) - (Ff / m)
= (9.8*sin9) - (Ff / 0.05)

How do i find Ff, frictional force?
 
  • #8
Meggett said:
cool thanks for your help so far...

ok so I've got:
a = (g*sin theta) - (Ff / m)
= (9.8*sin9) - (Ff / 0.05)

How do i find Ff, frictional force?

You measure a and then get the frictional force from the equation you wrote above. You'll get a time-averaged result, since you're making the assumption that the frictional force is constant.
 
  • #9
RoyalCat said:
You measure a and then get the frictional force from the equation you wrote above.

ok I'm stuck again...
Í was looking over in a textbook and the 'F' in the equation doesn't stand for frictional force, but the net force. Is that the same as friction? I'm so confused...
And i have no way of measuring 'a' so there are two unknowns in the equation and i cannot solve it...

sorry if I'm annoying :frown:
 
  • #10
Meggett said:
ok I'm stuck again...
Í was looking over in a textbook and the 'F' in the equation doesn't stand for frictional force, but the net force. Is that the same as friction? I'm so confused...
And i have no way of measuring 'a' so there are two unknowns in the equation and i cannot solve it...

sorry if I'm annoying :frown:

Don't sweat it, we're glad to help. :)

F is just the filler letter for force. Don't get too mixed up with memorizing the exact names certain equations put on things. Problems will rarely be consistent with the way the book names things. Look at the meaning rather than the names, and try not to mix the two up.

Putting an index on things, or using different notation should always clear things up for you.
For the net force, for instance, I usually stick to the notation [tex]\Sigma \vec F[/tex] rather than indexing it as [tex]F_{net}[/tex], or worse still, just leaving it as [tex]F[/tex]
That's just a recipe for utter confusion.

What exactly is your experiment going to be? What will you be measuring?

If you know the time it takes the balls to roll down an incline (The distance is known), starting from rest, then you can use kinematic equations to extract the equivalent acceleration.

[tex]S(t) = \frac{\bar{\vec a} t^2}{2}[/tex]

The net force in the direction parallel to the inclined plane is:
[tex]\Sigma \vec F_{incline}=mg\sin{\alpha} - F_{friction}[/tex]

If we let ourselves use an average, constant value for the force of the friction, or the rolling resistance, then we can extract the acceleration using the second law.
[tex]\Sigma \vec F_{incline}=m\vec a_{incline}[/tex]
[tex]\vec a_{incline}=g\sin{\alpha} - \frac{F_{friction}}{m}[/tex]

Do you understand now?

Oh, and one more major thing. A rolling ball is not slowed down by friction, as the point of contact of the ball with the surface its rolling on is at rest (No kinetic friction to slow it down).
What does slow a rolling ball down is what's called rolling resistance. I linked to the wiki article on it in my earlier post. It too depends on the normal, but it doesn't work in the same way as the friction you're used to working with, so you should start thinking of things in a different way.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ok I think I’ve got it… is this right?

TO FIND a:
S = 3m, t= 3.05sec

s = ut + ½ at2
3 = 0*3.05 + ½ * a*(3.05)2
3 = ½ * a* 9.303
0.322 = a / 2
2*0.322 = a
a = 0.644m/s2

TO FIND Ff:
Mass = 50g

a = (g*sin theta) - F/m
0.644 = (9.8*sin9) - F/0.05
0.644 = 1.533 - F/0.05
-0.889= - F/0.05
-0.044 = - F

Therefore frictional force = 0.044

Is that right??
 
  • #12
Yeah, that looks right. :) Just don't forget that it's in Newtons, and that you need to repeat the experiment a couple of times (And then use statistical tools to choose the best kind of average) for it to have any value.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
wicked :smile: thanks so much for all your help... you're awesome!
 

FAQ: What is the Effect of Dimpled Surfaces on Rolling Friction?

1. What is rolling friction?

Rolling friction, also known as rolling resistance, is the force that opposes the motion of a rolling object. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the surface it is rolling on, as well as other factors such as air resistance.

2. How is rolling friction different from other types of friction?

Rolling friction is different from other types of friction, such as static and kinetic friction, because it occurs between two objects in rolling motion rather than between two objects in sliding motion. It also tends to be lower than other types of friction, making it easier for objects to roll.

3. What factors affect rolling friction?

The amount of rolling friction experienced by an object depends on several factors, including the weight and shape of the object, the type and condition of the surface it is rolling on, and the speed at which it is rolling. Other factors that can affect rolling friction include the temperature, humidity, and air pressure in the environment.

4. How can I measure rolling friction in an experiment?

To measure rolling friction in an experiment, you can use a device called a rolling friction apparatus, which typically consists of a rotating wheel attached to a weighted arm. By measuring the force required to rotate the wheel and observing how it changes with different variables, you can determine the amount of rolling friction present.

5. What are some real-world applications of understanding rolling friction?

Understanding rolling friction is important in various industries, such as transportation and manufacturing, where reducing friction can improve efficiency and save energy. It is also relevant in sports and recreation, as well as in the design and maintenance of household and personal items, such as wheels and bearings.

Back
Top