What is the energy equation in Schrodinger's Spherical equation?

In summary, the energy equation in Schrödinger's Spherical equation describes the behavior of quantum particles in a spherically symmetric potential. It is derived from the time-independent Schrödinger equation, where the total energy of the system is expressed as the sum of kinetic and potential energy. The equation takes the form of a differential equation that involves radial coordinates, allowing solutions that represent wave functions of particles in three-dimensional space. This approach is crucial for understanding phenomena in quantum mechanics, such as electron behavior in atoms.
  • #1
Danielk010
34
4
Homework Statement
Show by direct substitution that the wave function corresponding to n = 1, l = 0, m l = 0 is a
solution of Eq. 7.10 corresponding to the ground-state energy of hydrogen.
Relevant Equations
Schrodinger's Spherical equation: ## \frac {-\hbar^2} {2m} (\frac {d^2 \psi} {dr^2} + \frac {2} {r} * \frac {d\psi} {dr} + \frac {1} {r^2\sin(\theta)} * \frac {d} {d\theta} * \sin(\theta) *\frac {d\psi} {d\theta} + \frac {1} {r^2\sin(\theta)^2} * \frac {d^2\psi} {d\phi^2}) + U(r) * \psi (r, \theta, \phi) = E * \psi (r, \theta, \phi) ##
Radial equation: ##\frac {2*e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {a_0^{\frac {3} {2}}} ##
Theta equation: ## \frac {1} {\sqrt 2} ##
Phi equation: ## \frac {1} {\sqrt {2\pi}} ##
Wave function = Radial equation * Theta equation * Phi equation
Wave function: ##\frac {e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {\sqrt \pi * a_0^{\frac {3} {2}}} ##
My final energy result: ## \frac {2\pi\varepsilon_0 (-\hbar^2 * r + 2a_0^2\hbar^2) - ma_0^4e^2} {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r a_0^4 m} ##
I attempted the problem by first finding the radial, theta, and phi equation for the ground state of a hydrogen atom. I multiplied the three equations to get the wave equation. From there, I took each derivative in the Schrodinger Spherical equation and found that ## \frac {\partial^2 \psi} {\partial \phi^2} = 0 ## and ## \frac {\partial \psi} {\partial \theta} = 0 ##. From there I found that ## \frac {\partial \psi} {\partial r} = \frac {-e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {\sqrt \pi * a_0^{\frac {5} {2}}} ## and ## \frac {\partial \psi^2} {\partial r^2} = \frac {e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {\sqrt \pi * a_0^{\frac {7} {2}}} ##. I then just plugged in the different equations including, ## U(r) = \frac {-e^2} {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} ## into the equation to get my final result for energy. Compared to ## E_1 = \frac {-me^4} {32\pi^2\varepsilon_0^2\hbar^2} ## I am not sure if I did the math wrong to not get that energy equation or is there a different energy equation I should use. Thank you for any help provided.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Danielk010 said:
Radial equation: ##\frac {2*e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {a_0^{\frac {3} {2}}} ##
Theta equation: ## \frac {1} {\sqrt 2} ##
Phi equation: ## \frac {1} {\sqrt {2\pi}} ##

These are not equations.

Danielk010 said:
From there, I took each derivative in the Schrodinger Spherical equation and found that ## \frac {\partial^2 \psi} {\partial \phi^2} = 0 ## and ## \frac {\partial \psi} {\partial \theta} = 0 ##. From there I found that ## \frac {\partial \psi} {\partial r} = \frac {-e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {\sqrt \pi * a_0^{\frac {5} {2}}} ## and ## \frac {\partial \psi^2} {\partial r^2} = \frac {e^{\frac {-r} {a_0}}} {\sqrt \pi * a_0^{\frac {7} {2}}} ##. I then just plugged in the different equations including, ## U(r) = \frac {-e^2} {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} ## into the equation to get my final result for energy. Compared to ## E_1 = \frac {-me^4} {32\pi^2\varepsilon_0^2\hbar^2} ## I am not sure if I did the math wrong to not get that energy equation or is there a different energy equation I should use. Thank you for any help provided.
For the radial part you took the second derivative with respect to ##r## but it seems that you left out the ##\frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial r}## term.
 
  • #3
kuruman said:
These are not equations.


For the radial part you took the second derivative with respect to ##r## but it seems that you left out the ##\frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial r}## term.
I multiplied the ##\frac{2}{r}## after getting the derivative. Also what do you mean they are not equations?
 
  • #4
Danielk010 said:
Also what do you mean they are not equations?
Equations usually have an "equals" sign that looks like ##=##.
All I see is a colon that looks like ##:##

After you take your derivatives and you get what you call your "final energy result", that's only half of an equation. Write an equation that separates two sides with an ##=## sign and has mathematical expressions on each side, not words on one and a mathematical expression on the other. If your "final energy result" is on the left-hand side, what should be on the right-hand side?
 
  • #5
kuruman said:
Equations usually have an "equals" sign that looks like ##=##.
All I see is a colon that looks like ##:##

After you take your derivatives and you get what you call your "final energy result", that's only half of an equation. Write an equation that separates two sides with an ##=## sign and has mathematical expressions on each side, not words on one and a mathematical expression on the other. If your "final energy result" is on the left-hand side, what should be on the right-hand side?
Oh my bad. For my final energy result it would E = *that equation*
 
  • #6
Danielk010 said:
Oh my bad. For my final energy result it would E = *that equation*
You still have not written down an equation. Remember, mathematical expressions on both sides.
 
  • #7
kuruman said:
You still have not written down an equation. Remember, mathematical expressions on both sides.
Sorry. E = ## \frac {2\pi\varepsilon_0 (-\hbar^2 * r + 2a_0^2\hbar^2) - ma_0^4e^2} {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r a_0^4 m} ##
 
  • #8
Where did you get that E is equal to all those derivatives that you took?
 
  • #9
kuruman said:
Where did you get that E is equal to all those derivatives that you took?
I used the schordinger equation. I wrote the math down. Would it be better if I shared a picture of the math?
 
  • #10
Danielk010 said:
I used the schordinger equation. I wrote the math down. Would it be better if I shared a picture of the math?
The right hand side of the equation is ##E~\psi(r)##. Show me the equation that has your "final energy result" plus the potential energy on the left side and ##E~\psi(r)## on the right side. Yes, share a picture of the math but make sure it's legible.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
The right hand side of the equation is ##E~\psi(r)##. Show me the equation that has your "final energy result" plus the potential energy on the left side and ##E~\psi(r)## on the right side. Yes, share a picture of the math but make sure it's legible.
20240415_190938.jpg


The ##\psi(r)## was canceled out.
 

Attachments

  • 20240415_190919(1).jpg
    20240415_190919(1).jpg
    30.8 KB · Views: 25
  • #12
I deleted my immediate reply in case you saw it because I misread the ##r## in the denominator. I will post an more appropriate reply soon.
 
  • #13
thank you so much for the help.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
  • #14
Here is the more appropriate reply. First of all the powers of ##a_0## in the denominator are incorrect. If you divide ##a_0^{7/2}## by ##a_0^{3/2}##, you don't get ##a_0^4## which is ##a_0^{8/2}##. Same problem with ##a_0^{5/2}##. Fix it.

In the corrected simplified equation (see below), replace ##U(r) with what it is equal to but do not add the fractions. Instead factor out the ##\frac{1}{r}## in the two terms that contain it and rewrite the equation.

Screen Shot 2024-04-15 at 6.39.37 PM.png

Do you see where to go next? Ask if you don't.
 
  • #15
kuruman said:
Here is the more appropriate reply. First of all the powers of ##a_0## in the denominator are incorrect. If you divide ##a_0^{7/2}## by ##a_0^{3/2}##, you don't get ##a_0^4## which is ##a_0^{8/2}##. Same problem with ##a_0^{5/2}##. Fix it.

In the corrected simplified equation (see below), replace ##U(r) with what it is equal to but do not add the fractions. Instead factor out the ##\frac{1}{r}## in the two terms that contain it and rewrite the equation.

View attachment 343474
Do you see where to go next? Ask if you don't.
20240415_201200.jpg

So would this be correct?
 
  • #16
I said
kuruman said:
In the corrected simplified equation (see below), replace ##U(r) with what it is equal to but do not add the fractions. Instead factor out the ##\frac{1}{r}## in the two terms that contain it and rewrite the equation.
Do it.
 
  • #17
kuruman said:
I said

Do it.
Sorry. Would this be correct?
20240415_202808.jpg
 
  • #18
I works except that its sideways. Look at the equation. On the right you have the ground state state energy which is a constant. On the left you have a constant ##C_1## times of ##\frac{1}{r}## plus another constant ##C_2##. How can that be reconciled? Hint: This equation must hold for any ##r##.

Also, it looks like you are unsure about dividing powers. If the base is the same, you subtract the exponent in the denominator from the exponent in the numerator
$$\frac{a_0^{\frac{5}{2}}}{a_0^{\frac{3}{2}}}=a_0^{\frac{5}{2}-\frac{3}{2}}=a_0^{\frac{2}{2}}=a_0.$$Fix it before you proceed.
 
  • #19
kuruman said:
I works except that its sideways. Look at the equation. On the right you have the ground state state energy which is a constant. On the left you have a constant ##C_1## times of ##\frac{1}{r}## plus another constant ##C_2##. How can that be reconciled? Hint: This equation must hold for any ##r##.

Also, it looks like you are unsure about dividing powers. If the base is the same, you subtract the exponent in the denominator from the exponent in the numerator
$$\frac{a_0^{\frac{5}{2}}}{a_0^{\frac{3}{2}}}=a_0^{\frac{5}{2}-\frac{3}{2}}=a_0^{\frac{2}{2}}=a_0.$$Fix it before you proceed.
Thank you. Would equating r to be 1 work?
 
  • #20
Danielk010 said:
Thank you. Would equating r to be 1 work?
Nope. Like I said, it should hold for any ##r##, not just for the specific value of ##r=1##. Besides, what does "1" mean? One meter. one inch, one light year, one what? You need to ponder this a bit that is why I am not giving you the answer. Just think. What must be true for E on the other side to be constant?
 
  • #21
kuruman said:
Nope. Like I said, it should hold for any ##r##, not just for the specific value of ##r=1##. Besides, what does "1" mean? One meter. one inch, one light year, one what? You need to ponder this a bit that is why I am not giving you the answer. Just think. What must be true for E on the other side to be constant?
Should you just plug in Bohr's radius?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
That would not work. Look, you have an equation that looks like
##E=\dfrac{1}{r}C_1+C_2## where ##C_1## and ##C_2## are constants.
You want ##E## to be a constant. What must be true so that you can write
##E=const.##?
In other words, how can you get rid of the ##\frac{1}{r}## term?
Remember the equation is
$$\frac{1}{r}\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{ma_0}-\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right)-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma_0^2}=E.$$
 
Last edited:
  • #23
kuruman said:
That would not work. Look, you have an equation that looks like
##E=\dfrac{1}{r}C_1+C_2## where ##C_1## and ##C_2## are constants.
You want ##E## to be a constant. What must be true so that you can write
##E=const.##?
In other words, how can you get rid of the ##\frac{1}{r}## term?
Solve for r, and then plug it in? ## r = \frac {C_1} {E-C_2} ##
 
  • #24
No. Set ##C_1=0.## When you do that, which of the quantities in ##C_1## have fixed values?
 
  • #25
kuruman said:
No. Set ##C_1=0.## When you do that, which of the quantities in ##C_1## have fixed values?
all of the values except m
 
  • #26
Why except ##m##? Isn't the mass of the electron fixed at ##9.11\times 10^{-31}~## kg?
What about the Bohr radius ##a_0##? What is an expression for it, not a numerical value. Look it up if you don't remember.
 
  • #27
Oh my bad. All of the values in Bohr's radius are constants if I am not mistaken. ##a_0 = \frac {4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2} {m_e*e}##. 4, \pi, \hbar and the permittivity are all constants. An electron's rest mass is constant (##0.511 Mev##), and the elementary charge of an electron is also a constant.
 
  • #28
What happens when you substitute the expression that you quoted for ##a_0## in $$\frac{1}{r}\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{ma_0}-\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right)-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma_0^2}=E~~?$$
 
  • #29
kuruman said:
What happens when you substitute the expression that you quoted for ##a_0## in $$\frac{1}{r}\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{ma_0}-\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right)-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma_0^2}=E~~?$$
oohhh. I got it. thank you for the help
 
  • #30
The expression for the Bohr radius is obtained by setting the coefficient of the ##\dfrac{1}{r}## term equal to zero. This ensures that the energy of the ground state is constant for any value of variable ##r##.
 
  • Like
Likes Danielk010

FAQ: What is the energy equation in Schrodinger's Spherical equation?

What is the Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates?

The Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates is a form of the time-independent Schrödinger equation that accounts for the symmetry of spherical systems. It is expressed as:

−(ħ²/2m) [1/r² ∂/∂r(r² ∂ψ/∂r) + 1/(r² sin θ) ∂/∂θ(sin θ ∂ψ/∂θ) + 1/(r² sin² θ) ∂²ψ/∂φ²] + V(r, θ, φ)ψ = Eψ

What do the variables in the spherical Schrödinger equation represent?

In the spherical Schrödinger equation, the variables represent the following: ψ is the wave function of the system, E is the total energy of the particle, V is the potential energy, r is the radial distance from the origin, θ is the polar angle, and φ is the azimuthal angle. The constants ħ and m represent the reduced Planck's constant and the mass of the particle, respectively.

How is the energy term 'E' determined in the Schrödinger equation?

The energy term 'E' in the Schrödinger equation is determined by solving the equation for specific boundary conditions and potential energy functions. The solutions yield quantized energy levels for bound systems, which correspond to the allowed energy states of a quantum system.

What role does the potential energy V play in the spherical Schrödinger equation?

The potential energy V in the spherical Schrödinger equation defines the interaction between the particle and the environment. It influences the shape of the wave function and the energy levels. Different forms of V can lead to different physical scenarios, such as the hydrogen atom or a particle in a spherical well.

Can the spherical Schrödinger equation be solved analytically?

Yes, the spherical Schrödinger equation can often be solved analytically for specific potentials, such as the Coulomb potential of the hydrogen atom. However, for more complex potentials, numerical methods or approximation techniques may be necessary to find solutions for the wave function and energy levels.

Back
Top