What is the formula for finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

In summary, the conversation discusses the formula for finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix. The suggested methods include row reduction, cofactor expansion, and using functional programming languages. However, it is noted that finding the explicit formula for a 10x10 matrix would be a difficult and tedious task, and it is suggested to use numerical methods instead. The conversation ends with a mention of a possible formula using Leibniz's formula for the determinant.
  • #1
Zythyr
32
0
I am trying to figure out the formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix. I was told to use row reducation method, but I am not really sure what it is. I never took Linear Algebra. Can someone please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
It's going to be quite tedious even if you were to row-reduce it before finding its determinant. Some special matrices have easy determinants, so maybe you could see if the matrix for which you are trying to evaluate the determinant has some property which allows you to compute its determinant easily.

EDIT: I see that you say you are trying to "figure out the formula". There's a recursive method for finding the determinants of an arbitrary nxn matrix. It's known as cofactor expansion.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I know that's not what you are asking for, but in the case of 10x10... go numerical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Definitely go numerical. It's going to take a long time computing the determinant of that unless it was diagonal.
 
  • #6
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the forumla? please
 
  • #8
Put the matrix in a list and use guassian elimination, and sounds like the perfect sort of problem for a functional programming language.
 
  • #9
The explicit formula for such a matrix will be a horrible, horrible mess (think many many pages).

You are almost guarenteed to make an algebra error somewhere. This is exactly what computers are for.
 
  • #10
Zythyr said:
Umm I can't go numerical... I need to do it in terms of formulas... And no, diagonals arent allowed. What can I do? Can someone help me determine the forumla? please
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.
 
  • #11
Defennder said:
Is this question from a textbook? If so, then perhaps it's best if you were to post the exact problem. The problem with devising a formula for the determinant of a 10x10 matrix is that it would require far too many variables, at least 100 variables would be needed, each for every entry of the matrix. I doubt any textbook problem would require such to be done.

Not in a textbook. My proffesor for Diffiq said if anyone figures out the forumal for the dertminant of a 10x10, they automatically get an A in the class.
 
  • #12
I'm pretty sure he meant that tongue-in-cheek. To clarify, did you ask him why he wanted only the formula for a 10x10 matrix and not some other arbitrary size?
 
  • #13
If you really want it [and don't want to derive it], you can write a short Maple program.

with(LinearAlgebra); M:=Matrix(3,3,symbol=m); Determinant(M);

You might wish gradually tune the size of the square matrix up to your desired value... but you should be prepared to wait.
 
  • #14
Finding the formula is really simple. You'd just need several pages to write/print it, and there would be 100 variables. So you'd be very likely to make a mistake somewhere if you tried to do it by hand.

I doubt that your professor would actually give an A for it though since it is extremely easy.

Hell, I wonder if this would suffice: (Let [tex]a_{i,j}[/tex] denote the i,jth entry of the matrix)
[tex]\sum_{\sigma \in S_{10}} \text{sgn}(\sigma) \sum_{i=1}^{10} a_{i, \sigma(i)}[/tex]
because that is one way to write the formula. It's called Leibniz's formula for the determinant. Of course you'd need to know what [tex]S_{10}[/tex] is and what the sign of an element of [tex]S_{10}[/tex] means as well as how to interpret the summation signs
 

FAQ: What is the formula for finding the determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

What is a determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

The determinant of a 10x10 matrix is a scalar value that can be calculated from the elements of the matrix. It is a measure of the matrix's size and shape, and is used in various mathematical calculations.

How is the determinant of a 10x10 matrix calculated?

The determinant of a 10x10 matrix is calculated by expanding the matrix into smaller submatrices and then applying the Laplace expansion method or the Gaussian elimination method. These methods involve multiplying and adding the elements of the submatrices in a specific way to arrive at the determinant value.

What is the importance of the determinant of a 10x10 matrix?

The determinant of a 10x10 matrix is an important mathematical concept that has various applications in fields such as linear algebra, physics, and engineering. It can help determine if a system of equations has a unique solution, calculate the area or volume of a shape, and even determine the invertibility of a matrix.

Can the determinant of a 10x10 matrix be negative?

Yes, the determinant of a 10x10 matrix can be negative. The sign of the determinant depends on the pattern of positive and negative elements in the matrix. It is negative if the number of row swaps required to transform the matrix into an upper triangular form is odd, and positive if it is even.

What is the relationship between the determinant of a 10x10 matrix and its eigenvalues?

The determinant of a 10x10 matrix is equal to the product of its eigenvalues. This means that knowing the determinant and eigenvalues of a matrix can provide useful information about each other. For example, if the determinant is zero, then at least one of the eigenvalues must also be zero, and vice versa.

Similar threads

Back
Top