What Is the Height at Which the Boy Leaves the Ice?

  • Thread starter Kudo Shinichi
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary: F_1=ma_1F_2=ma_2F_3=ma_3In summary, the conversation discusses a physics prove question regarding a boy sliding down a frictionless ice surface on a hemispherical mound of ice. The conversation suggests using conservation of energy to find the boy's velocity, and then relates this velocity to the normal force using Newton's second law in the radial direction. The conclusion is that the boy leaves the ice at a point whose height is 2R/3.
  • #1
Kudo Shinichi
109
1
HELP!physics prove question

Homework Statement


A boy is seated on the top of a hemispherical mound of ice. He is given a very small push and starts sliding down the ice surface, assumed to be fricitionless. show that he leaves the ice at a point who height is 2R/3

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to do this question. However, I know that the normal force disappears as he leaves the ice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Kudo Shinichi said:
A boy is seated on the top of a hemispherical mound of ice. He is given a very small push and starts sliding down the ice surface, assumed to be fricitionless. show that he leaves the ice at a point who height is 2R/3

I know that the normal force disappears as he leaves the ice.

Hi Kudo Shinichi! :smile:

Hint: calculate his speed at an angle θ, then caclulate the normal force.
 
  • #3


tiny-tim said:
Hi Kudo Shinichi! :smile:

Hint: calculate his speed at an angle θ, then caclulate the normal force.

x-direction:
v_0=v_0*cosθ
then use V_f=V_0+at
y-direction:
V_0=V_0*sinθ
then use V_f=V_0+at
but I have some many unknown variables...
Normal force=mg
also, How can i relate the speed to the normal force since F_n=mg
 
  • #4
Kudo Shinichi said:
… then use V_f=V_0+at …

Nooo … that equation (and the other two kinematic equations) only work if a is constant … which will only happen in free-fall, or on a slope.

This is a sphere, not a slope.

Hint: use conservation of energy. :smile:
 
  • #5


tiny-tim said:
Nooo … that equation (and the other two kinematic equations) only work if a is constant … which will only happen in free-fall, or on a slope.

This is a sphere, not a slope.

Hint: use conservation of energy. :smile:

Do you mean conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy?
P=P'
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

KE=KE'
1/2m1v1^2+1/2m2v2^2=1/2m1(v1')^2+1/2m2(v2')^2
Since the initial velocity is equal to 0
therefore,
m1v1'=-m2v2'
1/2m1(v1')^2=-1/2m2(v2')^2
we don't know the mass of the boy, how can we find out the velocity...also you said find out the velocity by using angles, but i didn't need to use any angle on the above equations. I still don't really understand how to relate the velocity to the normal force, because normal force is equal to mg and both variables are nothing to do with velocity.
 
  • #6
Kudo Shinichi said:
Do you mean conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy?
P=P'
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

conservation of momentum (m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2') and conservation of energy are entirely different things :frown:

conservation of momentum will not work on a curved surface.
KE=KE'

conservation of kinetic energy does not exist

it's conservation of energy … that's total energy, not just kinetic energy:

KE + PE = constant
m1v1'=-m2v2'
1/2m1(v1')^2=-1/2m2(v2')^2

this is obviously the wrong equation … whatever is m2?

Try again. :smile:
 
  • #7


tiny-tim said:
conservation of momentum (m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2') and conservation of energy are entirely different things :frown:

conservation of momentum will not work on a curved surface.


conservation of kinetic energy does not exist

it's conservation of energy … that's total energy, not just kinetic energy:

KE + PE = constant


this is obviously the wrong equation … whatever is m2?

Try again. :smile:

Total mechanical energy=PE+KE
PE+KE=0
PE=-KE
mgh=-1/2mv^2
m(9.8)(2R/3)=-1/2mv^2
m cancels out
v^2=9.8(2R/3)(-2)
v=sqrt(9.8*(2R/3)*-2)

I think this is the velocity that i need to find
and we know that the normal force =0 when the both is at the h=2R/3, but how do we relate the velocity to the normal force and how do we show that the boy leaves at height=2R/3
 
  • #8
Kudo Shinichi said:
… but how do we relate the velocity to the normal force and how do we show that the boy leaves at height=2R/3

Use Newton's second law in the radial (normal) direction. :smile:
 
  • #9


tiny-tim said:
Use Newton's second law in the radial (normal) direction. :smile:

Total mechanical energy=PE+KE
PE+KE=0
PE=-KE
mgh=-1/2mv^2
m(9.8)(2R/3)=-1/2mv^2
m cancels out
v^2=9.8(2R/3)(-2)
v=sqrt(9.8*(2R/3)*-2)

f=m*dv/dt
f=m*d(sqrt(9.8*(2R/3)*-2))/dt

this is the force we got
sorry, but I still don't get how can we prove that the boy starts from 2R/3 by using the force we got from above.
 
  • #10
Kudo Shinichi said:
f=m*dv/dt

No!

fnet = ma.

(a only = dv/dt if the motion is in a straight line … this is along a curve)

What is fnet?
 
  • #11


tiny-tim said:
No!

fnet = ma.

(a only = dv/dt if the motion is in a straight line … this is along a curve)

What is fnet?

F_net is the net force, which is also stands for all the forces we applied.
F_net=F_1+F_2+F_3+...
F_net=ma
in this case a is equal to v because
a=v(T2)-v(T1)
and the initial velocity in the problem is zero
therefore a= v-0 a=v a=v=sqrt(9.8*(2R/3)*-2)

F_net=m*v=m*sqrt(9.8*(2R/3)*-2)
= sqrt(-13.1R)*m
 
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
What is fnet?
Kudo Shinichi said:
F_net=F_1+F_2+F_3+...

So what are F_1 F_2 and F_3?
 
  • #13


tiny-tim said:
So what are F_1 F_2 and F_3?

F_1=ma_1
F_2=ma_2
F_3=ma_3
 

FAQ: What Is the Height at Which the Boy Leaves the Ice?

What is the purpose of "HELP physics prove question"?

The purpose of "HELP physics prove question" is to provide a clear and concise explanation of a specific physics concept or theory, often using evidence and data to support the explanation.

How does "HELP physics prove question" differ from regular physics questions?

"HELP physics prove question" differs from regular physics questions in that it focuses on proving a specific concept or theory using scientific evidence and experimentation, rather than simply asking for an explanation or definition.

Can "HELP physics prove question" be used to solve real-world problems?

Yes, "HELP physics prove question" can be used to solve real-world problems as it involves the use of scientific methods and data to prove a concept or theory, which can then be applied to real-world situations.

Is "HELP physics prove question" only for advanced physicists?

No, "HELP physics prove question" can be used by anyone interested in learning more about a specific physics concept or theory and how it can be proven using scientific methods. It may be more challenging for those with limited knowledge of physics, but the explanations and evidence provided can still be valuable.

Are there any specific steps to follow when using "HELP physics prove question"?

While there are no set steps to follow, it is recommended to carefully read and understand the question, gather and analyze relevant data, and use scientific reasoning and evidence to prove the concept or theory in question.

Back
Top