- #36
Vast
- 285
- 0
Now you say:
Aren’t those signals binary? Meaning that the signal either fires or it doesn’t? And each time it fires, the signal is the same size? Information gets encoded at the frequency at which the signal is sent. In other words what do you mean by not deciphered?
So what’s the problem, we see neurons interacting and sending signals to one another.
Can’t you? I take it you mean that you can’t translate those patterns into thoughts, or brain functions, or movements. That’s not what I’ve read.
Anyway, it is indeed an interesting subject, but we’ve probably strayed off topic. Thanks SGT for the reminder, we still need to find a mechanism to propagate signals at a distance, and until someone mentions something, I don’t see telepathy being possible.
somasimple said:but messages remain ionic flows which are not decyphered.
Aren’t those signals binary? Meaning that the signal either fires or it doesn’t? And each time it fires, the signal is the same size? Information gets encoded at the frequency at which the signal is sent. In other words what do you mean by not deciphered?
somasimple said:PET has the same limitations and fMRI too, you see neurons that are working but that's all.
So what’s the problem, we see neurons interacting and sending signals to one another.
somasimple said:At lest, a colored image shows an area that works but I can't take my colours and translate them to a comprehensive human thing.
Can’t you? I take it you mean that you can’t translate those patterns into thoughts, or brain functions, or movements. That’s not what I’ve read.
Anyway, it is indeed an interesting subject, but we’ve probably strayed off topic. Thanks SGT for the reminder, we still need to find a mechanism to propagate signals at a distance, and until someone mentions something, I don’t see telepathy being possible.