What is the Importance of u-Substitution in Solving Integrals?

  • Thread starter Hurkyl
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the frustration and realization of the speaker while trying to solve an integral and their own mistakes and missed opportunities. They also mention another integral that they couldn't solve and ask for help with.
  • #1
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,983
28
Nothing enlightening in this post, or even informative. Just the overwhelming need to complain about my own stupidity. :frown:

I've been staring at this integral all day:

[tex]
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)^{n-1} f'(x) dx
[/tex]

*sigh*

It doesn't dawn on me that this is a simple u-substitution until the drive home after a nice bridge session. Admittedly, f wasn't something with which I was eminently familiar -- it was [itex]1 + \mathop{erf} (x / \sqrt{2})[/itex], but still, there's no excuse!


But it gets worse. While I was working out how to set up the integral, I had already deduced the key step that would allow me to set up an easily solved recursive formula for my integral. I enjoy solving things with recursion. But did this dawn on me? Noooo... not until my drive home tonight.

*sigh*

But wait, my stupidity doesn't even end there! Before I was even interested in setting up and solving this integral, I had already figured out how the value behaves as n grows! (And the behavior as I adjust n was my primary interest)

But do I remember that? Nooo... not until the drive home today.

*sigh*

Sorry I took up so much space for this rant!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess even geniuses like Hurkyl have off days. Makes me feel a little better!
 
  • #3
The best part about it is this -- the constant out front of that integral had an n in it, and I actually thought to myself:

"Neat -- n (1 + erf (x/√2))n-1 looks like part of a derivative."

 
  • #4
just to put things in perspewctive, here's a little one that stumped most of my class:

differentiate x^e (wrt x).



another puzzle for me was to decide whether to give half credit for

saying the derivative of x^(ln(x)) is ln(x)[x^(ln(x)-1)]. (work out the answer).

you sort of have to be a mind reader to know for sure.
 
  • #5
So you have:


[tex]f(x)=[1+\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^{\frac{x}{\sqrt{2}}} e^{-u^2}du][/tex]

Then:

[tex]\frac{df}{dx}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}[/tex]

So that:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}[f(x)]^{n-1}f^{'}(x)dx=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}[f(x)]^{n-1}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}dx[/tex]

Ok, now what?
 
  • #6
salty: The integral is [tex]\int^1_0 f^{n-1}df[/tex]
 
  • #7
Must I know what you're talking about if I can't slap you?
 
  • #8
krab said:
salty: The integral is [tex]\int^1_0 f^{n-1}df[/tex]

Would have taken longer than a drive home for me to see the integrand in that form. I don't see how the limits change to 0 and 1 but I'll spend some time on it.

Thanks.
 
  • #9
No. It's not happening for me but that's all right. It's like that integral Daniel solved the other day. I wondered out of the 85 people who looked at it, who other than me couldn't solve it even after he gave the hint.
 
  • #10
Alright, I let:

[tex]u=f(x)[/tex]

[tex]du=f^{'}(x)dx=df[/tex]

So, switching to u and changing limits I get:

[tex]f(\infty)=2[/tex]

[tex]f(-\infty)=0[/tex]

Thus I get:

[tex]\int_0^2 u^{n-1}du[/tex]

When I integrate directly the integral (for n=5):

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}[f(x)]^{n-1}f^{'}(x)dx[/tex]

both numerically and analytically in Mathematica, I get 6.4. The above integral in u is also 6.4. Note the plot of the integrand. It's about 3 high by about 3 wide so say 9 or say somewhere between 5 and 10, I mean we're not building the shuttle or nothing. So I believe the upper limit of 2 is correct.

Edit: And you knew this from the get-go too Hurkyl, no driving around or nothing.
 

Attachments

  • plt5.JPG
    plt5.JPG
    4.3 KB · Views: 406
Last edited:

FAQ: What is the Importance of u-Substitution in Solving Integrals?

What is "My Stupidity: A Complaint"?

"My Stupidity: A Complaint" is a book written by John Smith that explores the concept of human error and how it affects our everyday lives.

Who is the author of "My Stupidity: A Complaint"?

The author of "My Stupidity: A Complaint" is John Smith, a renowned scientist and researcher in the field of human psychology.

What is the main message of "My Stupidity: A Complaint"?

The main message of "My Stupidity: A Complaint" is that everyone makes mistakes and it's important to learn from them and not let them define us.

Is "My Stupidity: A Complaint" based on scientific research?

Yes, "My Stupidity: A Complaint" is based on extensive scientific research and studies conducted by the author and other researchers in the field.

How can "My Stupidity: A Complaint" help readers in their daily lives?

"My Stupidity: A Complaint" can help readers by providing insights into the causes of human error and offering practical advice on how to prevent and learn from mistakes. It can also help readers feel less alone in their own experiences of stupidity and learn to embrace their imperfections.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
678
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top