What is the Induction Proof for Convergence of a Non-Negative Sequence?

In summary, The conversation discusses the convergence of a series and the need to show that the sequence of partial sums is bounded. The proof relies on induction and the fact that the terms in the partial sums are non-negative. It is important to note that induction does not work for infinity and that the existence of a supremum of all partial sums must be shown separately.
  • #1
Sisyphus
62
0
something funny's going on here, and I can't see what For a sequence [tex] {x_n} [/tex] , where each term is non-negative

the series [tex] x_1 + x_2 + ... +x_n + ... [/tex] converges

proof:

it will suffice to show that the sequence of partial sums [tex] {s_n} [/tex] is bounded

where each [tex]s_i = x_1 + ... + x_i [/tex]

when i=1,
[tex] s_1 = x_1 [/tex]

so the result holds true for i=1

let the result be true for all positive numbers up to some k such that

[tex] s_k <= some b [/tex]

now consider [tex] s_{k+1} [/tex]...

[tex] s_{k+1} = s_k + x_{k+1} <= b + x_{k+1} [/tex]

so the result holds true for all k= 1, 2, 3 ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course finite sums are always bounded!

You're implicitly implying that there are infinitely many partial sums. Induction doesn't work for infinity, it only works for a given natural number.

ie, you haven't shown that the supremum of all partial sums exists.
 
  • #3
Sisyphus said:
it will suffice to show that the sequence of partial sums [tex] {s_n} [/tex] is bounded
no it won't

You need to show: there exist a S such that for any given Epsilon greater than 0 there exist a N (element of the natural numbers) where |S_n - S| < Epsilon provided that n>N.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
JonF said:
no it won't

You need to show: there exist a S such that for any given Epsilon greater than 0 there exist a N (element of the natural numbers) where |S_n - S| < Epsilon provided that n>N.

Well, since the terms in the partial sums are non-negative all he has to show is that ALL the partial sums are bounded by some number. And then he has a bounded monotone sequence of partial sums which implies they converge.

The induction showed that for every partial sum s_n there existed a number b such that s_n<b. This DOES NOT mean there exists an m such that s_n<=M for all n.
 
  • #5
ah, thanks for clearly that up. That's kind of subtle, and I doubt I would've figured it out by myself..

i guess i forgot that one of the reasons why we speak of partial sums in the first place is that they are all bound..
:smile:
 
  • #6
Induction doesn't work that way! Induction on n shows that statement Sn is true for any finite n.
 

FAQ: What is the Induction Proof for Convergence of a Non-Negative Sequence?

What is sketchy induction proof?

Sketchy induction proof is a type of mathematical proof that involves making a generalization based on a limited set of examples or observations. It is considered "sketchy" because it does not provide a complete or rigorous proof, but rather relies on intuition and pattern recognition.

How is sketchy induction proof different from regular induction proof?

Regular induction proof follows a structured and logical process, starting with a base case and then using deductive reasoning to prove a statement for all possible cases. Sketchy induction proof, on the other hand, relies more on intuition and generalization based on a limited set of examples.

Is sketchy induction proof considered a valid form of proof?

No, sketchy induction proof is not considered a valid form of proof. It may provide some insight or suggest a possible solution, but it is not enough to prove a statement conclusively. A rigorous and complete proof is still needed to confirm its validity.

What are the potential risks of using sketchy induction proof?

The main risk of using sketchy induction proof is that it may lead to incorrect conclusions or assumptions. It relies heavily on intuition and generalization, which can be influenced by personal biases or limited understanding of the problem. It is important to always validate sketchy induction proofs with a more rigorous approach.

When should sketchy induction proof be used?

Sketchy induction proof may be used as a starting point or as a preliminary step in solving a problem. It can help generate ideas and hypotheses, but it should not be relied upon as the sole method of proof. It is best used in combination with other proof techniques to validate and strengthen the argument.

Back
Top