- #1
Sisyphus
- 62
- 0
something funny's going on here, and I can't see what For a sequence [tex] {x_n} [/tex] , where each term is non-negative
the series [tex] x_1 + x_2 + ... +x_n + ... [/tex] converges
proof:
it will suffice to show that the sequence of partial sums [tex] {s_n} [/tex] is bounded
where each [tex]s_i = x_1 + ... + x_i [/tex]
when i=1,
[tex] s_1 = x_1 [/tex]
so the result holds true for i=1
let the result be true for all positive numbers up to some k such that
[tex] s_k <= some b [/tex]
now consider [tex] s_{k+1} [/tex]...
[tex] s_{k+1} = s_k + x_{k+1} <= b + x_{k+1} [/tex]
so the result holds true for all k= 1, 2, 3 ...
the series [tex] x_1 + x_2 + ... +x_n + ... [/tex] converges
proof:
it will suffice to show that the sequence of partial sums [tex] {s_n} [/tex] is bounded
where each [tex]s_i = x_1 + ... + x_i [/tex]
when i=1,
[tex] s_1 = x_1 [/tex]
so the result holds true for i=1
let the result be true for all positive numbers up to some k such that
[tex] s_k <= some b [/tex]
now consider [tex] s_{k+1} [/tex]...
[tex] s_{k+1} = s_k + x_{k+1} <= b + x_{k+1} [/tex]
so the result holds true for all k= 1, 2, 3 ...
Last edited: