What Is the Infimum of This Set of Superior Limits?

  • #1
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
2,073
244
Let ##\mathbb{R}^\omega_{+}## be the set of all sequences ##(a_n)_{n=1}^\infty## of positive real numbers. Determine the infimum $$\inf\left\{\limsup_{n \to \infty} \left(\frac{1 + a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right)^n : (a_n) \in \mathbb{R}^\omega_{+}\right\}$$
 
  • Like
Likes jbergman, Greg Bernhardt and topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First show, by way of contradiction, that ##e## is a lower bound of the set of superior limits. Then show that ##e## is the optimal bound.
 
  • Like
Likes jbergman, Greg Bernhardt and topsquark
  • #3
Euge said:
Let ##\mathbb{R}^\omega_{+}## be the set of all sequences ##(a_n)_{n=1}^\infty## of positive real numbers. Determine the infimum $$\inf\left\{\limsup_{n \to \infty} \left(\frac{1 + a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right)^n : (a_n) \in \mathbb{R}^\omega_{+}\right\}$$
Does a proof by definition of limsup and infimum of a set also work? I mean not through contradiction as you suggest.

For example one can look at the sequence ##a_n=n/x##, and see that ##((1+a_{n+1})/a_n)^n## converges to ##e^{x+1}##, where ##x>0##, since we take the infinimum over all limsup, then when ##x\to 0## we get the infimum here.
This is seen as the optimum.
But I don't see how show that every other positive sequence gives a bigger limsup.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #4
I have some thoughts on progressing towards e being the infimum. Consider ##\limsup{a_{n+1}/a_n}##. First suppose it's larger than 1.
Since ##(1+x)/y > x/y## when x and y are positive, this means we can find ##\epsilon>0## and a subsequence for which ##((1+a_{n+1})/a_n)^n > (1+\epsilon)^n## and hence the limsup is infinity.

On the other hand if ##\limsup{a_{n+1}/a_n} <1## then the sequence decays at least as fast as a geometric sequence and must go to zero. As soon as ##a_n<1## we have ##(1+a_{n+1})/a_n > 1/a_n >1## and again the limsup must be infinity. So the only interesting thing is what happens when the limsup of this ratio is exactly 1.

Edit: now we can consider ##\limsup{(1+a_{n+1})/a_n}##. This must be at least 1 since all we've done is add 1 to the numerator. If it's larger than 1 then clearly ##\limsup{((1+a_{n+1})/a_n)^n}## is infinity. So this must also be 1. For the limsup to be 1 in both cases it must be that ##a_n\to \infty## whenever we restrict to a subsequence that makes ##a_{n_k+1}/a_{n_k}\to 1##.

So we are just interested in sequences ##a_n## going to infinity, and We can rewrite the original expression as ##(1+(a_{n+1}-a_n+1)/a_n)^n## and ,I guess the point is since we know the sequence is going to infinity, ##(a_{n+1}-a_n+1)/a_n)## is at least ##1/n##. Intuitively this is because if ##a_n## grows slower than ##n##, then we have at least ##1/a_n## and we're done. If ##a_n## grows faster, then the ##(a_{n+1}-a_n)/a_n## is at least ##1/n##. Turning this into a formal proof seems tricky and I suspect I missed a clever step to avoid a lot of this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Back
Top