What is the meaning of "excess" Goldstone bosons?

  • A
  • Thread starter jack476
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Bosons
  • #1
jack476
328
125
TL;DR Summary
What does it mean when a Lagrangian has more Goldstone bosons than there are spontaneously broken generators?
Although strictly speaking this is motivated by a classical field theory problem, I felt that the quantum physics subforum would be more appropriate because it pertains to topics which to my understanding are almost entirely dealt with in the context of QFT.

The most commonly stated form of Goldstone's theorem is that there is one massless scalar boson corresponding to each spontaneously broken generator of the global symmetry group. In most situations there is exactly one Goldstone boson for each broken generator, but in the book I'm working through, The Classical Theory of Gauge Fields, the authors Rubakov and Wilson point out that the theory actually says that there are at least as many Goldstone bosons as there are broken generators. It is possible for there to be more Goldstone bosons than there are broken generators.

As an example, consider the following Lagrangian for a pair of complex scalar fields ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2##:
$$\mathcal{L} = \partial_{\mu}\phi_1^*\partial_{\mu}\phi_1 + \partial_{\mu}\phi_2^*\partial_{\mu}\phi_2 - \lambda\big(\phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2 - v^2\big)^2$$ where ##v## is a real constant. The global symmetry group is the group of matrices with the form $$\omega = \begin{bmatrix} e^{i\alpha} & 0 \\0 & e^{i\beta} \end{bmatrix}$$
We can write the pair of complex scalars as the two elements of a column ##\phi## in the fundamental representation space of ##U(2)##, and then we can write the kinetic energy and the term ##\phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2## as:
$$ \partial_{\mu}\phi_1^*\partial_{\mu}\phi_1 + \partial_{\mu}\phi_2^*\partial_{\mu}\phi_2 = \begin{bmatrix} \partial_{\mu}\phi_1^* & \partial_{\mu}\phi_2^* \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\partial_{\mu}\phi_1 \\ \partial_{\mu}\phi_2\end{bmatrix} \quad \text{,} \quad \phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2 = \begin{bmatrix} \phi_1^* & \phi_2^* \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\phi_1 \\\phi_2\end{bmatrix}$$
Let ##\omega = \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix} \in U(2)##, then the kinetic energy is clearly invariant under ##\phi \to \omega \phi## since under this transformation ##\phi^\dagger \to \phi^{\dagger} \omega^{\dagger}## and ##\omega \in U(2) \implies \omega^{\dagger} = \omega^{-1}.## However, ##\phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2## is not invariant under ##\phi \to \omega \phi## unless ##\omega## also has the property that ##\omega^{\dagger} J \omega = J## where ##J = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}##, meaning that the ##U(2)## symmetry is explicitly broken down to ##U(2) \cap SU(1,1)##. The conditions ##\omega^{\dagger}\omega = I## and ##\omega^{\dagger}J\omega = J## set up a system of six equations in the four variables ##a, b, c, d##, though we only need the first four:
$$\begin{align*}
a^*a+c^*c &= 1 \\
a^*b+c^*d &= 0 \\
b^*b+d^*d &= 1 \\
a^*a-c^*c &= 1
\end{align*}$$
Add the first equation to the fourth to get ##2a^*a = 2## which means that ##a = e^{i\alpha}##, then the first equation becomes ##1+c^*c =1## so ##c = 0##, which in turn means that the second equation becomes ##a^*b = 0## meaning that ##b=0##, and then finally the third equation becomes ##d^*d = 1## so ##d=e^{i\beta}##. Therefore the global symmetry group of ##\mathcal{L}## is the subgroup of ##U(2)## which contains matrices of the form ##\omega = \begin{bmatrix} e^{i\alpha} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\beta} \end{bmatrix}##.
Note that the generators of small transformations are ##T^1 = \begin{bmatrix} i & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \text{ and } T^2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{bmatrix}##.

The equations for the ground state are:
$$\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi_1} = 4{\lambda}\phi_1^*\big( \phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2 - v^2 \big) &= 0 \\
\frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi_2} = -4{\lambda}\phi_2^*\big( \phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2 - v^2 \big) &= 0
\end{align*}$$
Other than the trivial vacuum ##\phi_1^{(v)}= \phi_2^{(v)} = 0##, the ground states must satisfy ##\phi_1^*\phi_1-\phi_2^*\phi_2 - v^2## so they take the form ##\phi^{(v)} = \begin{bmatrix}ae^{i\alpha_0} \\ be^{i\beta_0}\end{bmatrix}## where ##a_1, a_2 \in \mathbb{R}## and ##a^2-b^2 = v^2##. The phase angles ##\alpha_0## and ##\beta_0## are arbitrary and we will assume that they are both zero. First consider small excitations about the ground state with ##\phi_1^{(v)} = a## and ##\phi_2^{(v)} = b##, which spontaneously breaks the entire symmetry group. Let ##\chi_1, \chi_2, \theta_1, \theta_2## be small real scalar fields, then these vacuum excitations take the form ##\phi_1 = a+\chi_1+i\theta_1## and ##\phi_2 = b+\chi_2+i\theta_2##. Substitute these into ##\mathcal{L}## and expand to quadratic order to get:
$$\mathcal{L}^{(2)} = \big(\partial_{\mu}\chi_1\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\chi_2\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\theta_1\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\theta_2\big)^2- 4\lambda\big(a^2\chi_1^2+b^2\chi_2^2\big)$$

We get two massive scalars and two massless scalars, so that we have one massless scalar for each broken generator. Now consider the ground state ##\phi_1^{(v)} = v, \phi_2^{(v)} = 0##, so that small vacuum excitations have the form ##\phi_1 = v+\chi_1+i\theta_1## and ##\phi_2 = \chi_2+i\theta_2##. Now the symmetry is only partially spontaneously broken, with the unbroken subgroup being the group of matrices with the form ##\omega = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\beta} \end{bmatrix}##. The quadratic Lagrangian is:
$$\mathcal{L}^{(2)} = \big(\partial_{\mu}\chi_1\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\chi_2\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\theta_1\big)^2 + \big(\partial_{\mu}\theta_2\big)^2- 4\lambda v^2\chi_1^2$$

Only one of the two generators is broken by the ground state but now there are three massless scalar bosons. This doesn't violate Goldstone's theorem, but by my understanding it is still considered unusual. How should I interpret the fact that there are more Goldstone bosons than there are broken generators? The only two things that really stand out to me are 1.) that the condition ##a^2-b^2 = v^2## means that there are two disconnected families of vacuum states and 2.) that although ##\big(\phi_1^{(v)}, \phi_2^{(v)}\big) = (a, 0)## is a valid ground state, ##\big(\phi_1^{(v)}, \phi_2^{(v)}\big) = (0, b)## is not because then ##-b^2 = v^2## which is not possible for ##b, v \in \mathbb{R}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
At the first glance the reason is that the group is not semisimple but it's the direct product of two Abelian groups. So there's indeed no contradiction to Goldstone's theorem. For a very thorough treatment, see Weinberg, Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 2.
 
  • #3
https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01252
The Nambu-Goldstone theorem in non-relativistic systems
Ivan Arraut
In non-relativistic systems, when there is spontaneous symmetry breaking, the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons (nNG) are not necessarily equal to the number of broken generators (nBG). Here we use the method of operators for analyzing the necessary conditions in order to obtain the correct dispersion relation for the Nambu-Goldstone bosons.

"The Nambu-Goldstone theorem suggests that when the symmetry is spontaneously broken, the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons is equivalent to the number of broken generators [1–4]. This is the case in relativistic systems. In non-relativistic systems, this equality is not necessarily satisfied."

https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5212
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Bosons in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Tomas Brauner
"Theorem 3 (Nielsen and Chadha). Assume that translational invariance is not completely broken spontaneously and that there are no long-range interactions. Then the energy of a NG boson is analytic in momentum. Denoting NG modes whose energy is proportional to an odd power of momentum as type-I, and those whose energy is proportional to an even power of momentum as type-II, the number of type-I NG bosons plus twice the number of type-II NG bosons is greater than or equal to the number of broken symmetry generators."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
Excellent, thanks for the suggestions, I'll look at Weinberg and those two papers right now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
897
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top