MHB What is the minimum value of y in the Absolute Value Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the minimum value of the function y defined as y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+...+|nx-1|, where n is a natural number and both x and y are real numbers. Participants agree that the goal is to minimize y with respect to x, considering it as a function of n. Clarifications are made regarding the nature of the variables involved. The focus remains on the mathematical approach to achieve the minimization of y. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the absolute value function in this context.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Determine the minimum of $y$ where $y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+\cdots+|nx-1|$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The minimum of $y$ is zero and is achieved when $n = 1$ and $x = 1$.

Seriously though, should we minimize $y$ over $x$ as a function of $n$? Also, are $x, y$ real? (I assume $n$ is a natural number).
 
Bacterius said:
The minimum of $y$ is zero and is achieved when $n = 1$ and $x = 1$.

Seriously though, should we minimize $y$ over $x$ as a function of $n$? Also, are $x, y$ real? (I assume $n$ is a natural number).

Ops...my problem isn't very clear, and yes, Bacterius, your instinct are all right, $n$ is a natural number and both $x$ and $y$ are real, and we should minimize $y$ over $x$ as a function of $n$ instead.:o
 
My solution:

Note that if we are to graph of $y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+\cdots+|nx-1|$, we need to first determine the function for each piece from different interval, and each part in its interval is necessarily piecewise linear and hence the graph of $y$ will always looks like "elbow(\/)".

Therefore the minimum of $y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+\cdots+|nx-1|$ occurs at $kx-1=0$ by the time we see the changes of the gradient of the linear function turns from negative to positive.

I will illustrate this with an example.

If we have $y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+|4x-1|$ and we plot its graph, we see that we need to break the absolute function into 5 intervals:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 820"]
[TR]
[TD]For $x>1$:

$y=x-1+2x-1+3x-1+4x-1=10x-4$[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]For $\dfrac{1}{2}<x<1$:

$\begin{align*}y&=-(x-1)+2x-1+3x-1+4x-1\\&=-x+2x+3x+4x+1-1-1-1\\&=8x-2\end{align*}$[/TD]
[TD]For $\dfrac{1}{3}<x<\dfrac{1}{2}$:

$\begin{align*}y&=-(x-1)-(2x-1)+3x-1+4x-1\\&=-x-2x+3x+4x+1+1-1-1\\&=4x\end{align*}$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]For $\dfrac{1}{4}<x<\dfrac{1}{3}$:

$\begin{align*}y&=-(x-1)-(2x-1)-(3x-1)+4x-1\\&=-x-2x-3x+4x+1+1+1-1\\&=-2x+2\end{align*}$[/TD]
[TD]For $x<\dfrac{1}{4}$:

$\begin{align*}y&=-(x-1)-(2x-1)-(3x-1)-(4x-1)\\&=-x-2x-3x-4x+1+1+1+1\\&=-10x+4\end{align*}$[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
View attachment 4309From the graph, we can see that minimum of $y$ occurs at $3x-1=0$, i.e. $x=\dfrac{1}{3}$. This happens when the gradient of the piecewise linear function changes from $4$ ($y=4x$) to $-2$ ($y=-2x+2$). We can evaluate the minimum value by evaluating the function $-x-2x-3x+4x+1+1+1-1=-2x+2$ at $x=\dfrac{1}{3}$.

Now, back to the original problem to find the minimum of $y=|x-1|+|2x-1|+|3x-1|+\cdots+|nx-1|$. I know I need to focus on finding which $k$ value (from $kx-1$) does the gradient of the piecewise function changes from negative to positive. Since the only thing that matters is the gradient of the linear function, I will consider only all the coefficients of $x$ terms and discard the constants in finding for $k$. Here, $k$ is natural number.

$(1,\,2,\,3,\,\cdots,\,k-1),\,\,(k,\,k+1,\,\cdots,\,n)$

I know I need the sum from $(1,\,2,\,3,\,\cdots,\,k-1)$ is less than the sum from $(k,\,k+1,\,\cdots,\,n)$.

Therefore I get

$k\left(\dfrac{k-1}{2}\right)<(n+k)\left(\dfrac{n+1-k}{2}\right)$

I then solve the inequality above for natural number $k$, and obtain

$2k^2-2k-(n^2+n)<0$

$k=\left\lfloor\dfrac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{n^2+n}{2}}\right\rfloor$

Now, to find for its minimum value, we subtract the sum of $kx-1+(k+1)x-1+\cdots+nx-1$ from the sum of $x-1+2x-1+\cdots+(k-1)x-1$ and remember to replace $x=\dfrac{1}{k}$ and get:

$\begin{align*}y_{\text{min}}&=(kx-1+nx-1)\left(\dfrac{n+1-k}{2}\right)-(x-1+(k-1)x-1)\left(\dfrac{k-1}{2}\right)\\&=(kx+nx-2)\left(\dfrac{n+1-k}{2}\right)-(kx-2)\left(\dfrac{k-1}{2}\right)\\&=\left(\dfrac{n}{k}-1\right)\left(\dfrac{n+1-k}{2}\right)+\left(\dfrac{k-1}{2}\right)\end{align*}$

where $k=\left\lfloor\dfrac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{n^2+n}{2}}\right\rfloor$.
 

Attachments

  • Optimization Challenge.PNG
    Optimization Challenge.PNG
    3.8 KB · Views: 81
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top