What is the most beautiful definition you've encountered?

  • Thread starter tgt
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Definition
In summary, the conversation discussed various definitions and their beauty in mathematics. The most beautiful definition mentioned was the definition of e as a number satisfying d/dx(e^x) = e^x. This definition allows for several important concepts and results to be derived, such as the Maclaurin Series and l'Hopital's Rule. The conversation also touched on the concept of a beautiful proof, which involves creativity and insight in solving a problem. Euler's identity was also mentioned as a beautiful relationship between important mathematical constants.
  • #36
Continuity in the way I first heard it:

A funtion [tex]f:A\subseteq\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}[/tex] is continuous if, for each [tex]x\in A[/tex] and each [tex]\varepsilon>0[/tex], we can find some [tex]\delta>0[/tex] such that [tex]|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]|x-y|<\delta[/tex].

I know a lot of people tend not to like it when they first see it, but it was the first time I saw a mathematician take something so intuative then transform it into a solid mathematical form. That gave me a love of analysis/topology that I still hold. An alternative for me would possibly be the definition of the fundamental group.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #37
what about the definition where f^-1(U) is open whenever U is open.
 
  • #38
I like the classical form (I think because I have the memory "wow, maths can be beautiful" associated to it, rather than its intrinsic genius) but I can see why you like the more topological version.
 
  • #39
compactness: every open cover has a finite subcover
 
  • #40
I like the definition of NP the best. Easy to verify, hard to solve.
 
  • #41
EternalVortex said:
I like the definition of NP the best. Easy to verify, hard to solve.

That's a good one.
 
  • #42
All those cohomology business. It's hard to believe how much antisymmetry (of simplexes, tensor products..etc) gives you... Stokes theorem, De Rham's theorem and what not...even though I haven't fully understood them yet.
 
  • #43
The definition of Lebesgue integral as well. To understand how Riez representation theorem falls right out of it is amazing.
 

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
988
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
711
Back
Top