I What is the name of this geometry theorem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a geometry theorem related to the conditions under which a triangle can be formed given an angle and two sides, specifically under SSA (side-side-angle) conditions. It explains that if a side length (x) is equal to 10sin(30), exactly one triangle is formed; if x is greater, two triangles can exist; and if x is less, no triangle is formed. This scenario is identified as the ambiguous case of the law of sines. Participants express uncertainty about whether this concept has a formal name, but it is clarified that it relates to the law of sines. The conversation concludes with a focus on the implications of these conditions in triangle formation.
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
In geometry, there is a theorem pertaining to whether given an angle, side, and side gives 0, 1, or 2 triangles. See figure. In the figure, if x = 10sin(30) then there is exactly 1 triangle, if x > 10sin(30) then 2 triangles if x < 10sin(30) then no triangles. I think this has a theorem name or something that I can look up in a tggext book.

img439.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am not sure I get you. Your drawing is no triangle case, right ? Could you draw "2 triangles" case to confirm I get you properly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The condition for three sides, A, B, and C to make a triangle is that the sum of any two sides must be greater than the third side. Given an angle and two sides the question is will these form a triangle. There are three conditions depending on how long the "hanging" side is. In my diagram, the hanging side is x the other side is 10, and the angle is 30 deg. If x = 10sin(30) then there will be one right triangle. If x < 10sin(30) then there is no triangle, and if x > 10sin(30) then there will be two triangles. I guess there is not a theorem here, just a problem.
 
Thanks for explanation. Law of cosine
c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab \cos \gamma
Regarding this as quadratic equation of b
b^2-2a \cos \gamma \ b + a^2-c^2 = 0
D/4= (a \cos \gamma)^2 - a^2 + c^2 = ( c- a \sin \gamma )( c + a \sin \gamma)
##a \sin \gamma < c## : b has two real solutions with ##\alpha_1<\frac{\pi}{2}<\alpha_2##
##a \sin \gamma = c## : b has one real solution with ##\alpha=\frac{\pi}{2}##
##a \sin \gamma > c## : b has no real solution

I do not know whether this feature has a specific name or not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mathwonk and Lnewqban
barryj said:
In geometry, there is a theorem pertaining to whether given an angle, side, and side gives 0, 1, or 2 triangles. See figure. In the figure, if x = 10sin(30) then there is exactly 1 triangle, if x > 10sin(30) then 2 triangles if x < 10sin(30) then no triangles. I think this has a theorem name or something that I can look up in a tggext book.
I think it is called the law of Sines, since you are given SSA conditions on the triangle. This case is called the ambiguous case because there could be 0,1, 2 triangles.

cbarker1
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top