- #1
hholzer
- 37
- 0
Suppose you had a normal deck of 52 playing
cards and lost a card. You then decide to draw
a card from the remaining 51 cards.
What is the probability the drawn card is a spade?
Would this be appropriately captured by the following
events:
A : event card was drawn from the deck
S : event card drawn is a spade
S^c : event card drawn is not a spade
then
P(A) = P(A | S)P(S) + P(A|S^c)P(S^c)
But this is annoying me because
if we called S "event card drawn is a spade"
and A "event card was drawn from deck"
then P(A | S) doesn't seem to make much
sense to me. That is, "event card drawn
from the deck given drawn card is a spade"
is pretty much incoherent.
What am I missing or how can I resolve this issue?
cards and lost a card. You then decide to draw
a card from the remaining 51 cards.
What is the probability the drawn card is a spade?
Would this be appropriately captured by the following
events:
A : event card was drawn from the deck
S : event card drawn is a spade
S^c : event card drawn is not a spade
then
P(A) = P(A | S)P(S) + P(A|S^c)P(S^c)
But this is annoying me because
if we called S "event card drawn is a spade"
and A "event card was drawn from deck"
then P(A | S) doesn't seem to make much
sense to me. That is, "event card drawn
from the deck given drawn card is a spade"
is pretty much incoherent.
What am I missing or how can I resolve this issue?