MHB What Is the Probability of Receiving Identical Pairs from Random Crates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZooJersey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the probability of receiving identical pairs from random crates containing items labeled C1 to C8. A user reported obtaining exactly two of each item after opening 16 crates, which raised questions about the randomness of the outcome. The probability calculations suggest that the likelihood of receiving eight pairs of identical items is extremely low, approximately 1.43 x 10^-10. The conversation highlights the improbability of such an event occurring purely by chance, indicating that the outcome may not be random. Overall, the consensus leans towards the rarity of achieving this specific distribution of items.
ZooJersey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A friend stated they bought 16 crates all which could contain a random C1-C8 item. He then opened the crates and received exactly 2 each of every C1-C8 items.

So, (C1,C1) (C2,C2) (C3,C3) (C4,C4) (C5,C5) (C6,C6) (C7,C7) (C8,C8) is what he ended up with.

He stated this was good because there was an equal chance of getting them. I thought that this was highly unusual, and suggested there was no randomness since he received two of every possible item.

That brings me to the title question. What is the probability of receiving 8 pairs of identical boxes choosing from 8 items 16 times?

I thought it would be 12.5% for drawing a single item and 1.5% of matching a box then [(1.5%)(1.5%)]16 for getting two of all 8.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The probability of getting an item is 1. The probability of getting that same item is 1/8. The probability of then getting another item is 7/8. The probability of getting that same item is 1/8.

Continuing like that the probability of getting 8 items, each twice, is 1(1/8)(7/8)(1/8)(6/8)(1/8)(5/8)(1/8)(4/8)(1/8)(3/8)(1/8)(2/8)(1/8)(1/8)(1/8)= 7!/8^{15}. That is approximately [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]1.432454 x 10^{-10}[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif].

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top