- #36
FOIWATER
Gold Member
- 434
- 12
I disagree, I say there are two EMFs, which obviously can be added to yield one total EMF
One applied, and one self induced (when applied with AC, or any time there is relative motion, for that matter). The self induced EMF must be less than the applied obviously, since the current resultant of the former EMF is the reason the second EMF is induced. I say lenz' law determines the opposite polarity (since the fields are CONVERGING in a different matter), and the opposite polarity to what we can attribute inductive reactance. The ratio of the amount of voltage induced for a specific current change, multiplied by the angular frequency is where we get inductive reactance.
If you do not adhere to this, to what can you attribute inductive reactance?
One applied, and one self induced (when applied with AC, or any time there is relative motion, for that matter). The self induced EMF must be less than the applied obviously, since the current resultant of the former EMF is the reason the second EMF is induced. I say lenz' law determines the opposite polarity (since the fields are CONVERGING in a different matter), and the opposite polarity to what we can attribute inductive reactance. The ratio of the amount of voltage induced for a specific current change, multiplied by the angular frequency is where we get inductive reactance.
If you do not adhere to this, to what can you attribute inductive reactance?