What is the relationship between epsilon and sigma in multi-ferroic materials?

  • Thread starter Nickpga
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Intro
In summary, the TA ignored me, so I asked a forum for help. The professor boxed and starred my previous equation for stress, which I thought was strain. When I realized I was wrong, I thanked the person for helping me understand.
  • #1
Nickpga
22
2
Homework Statement
1D mechanical bar. Two different materials that clamped at x = 0. both are isotropic and perfectly bonded together. Young's modulus E1 = 10GPa and E2 = 50GPa. displacement of 2um at x = 2mm

Find the stresses, strains and displacements in each of the bars.
Plot the energy per unit volume in material 1 as a function of the Young's modulus in material 1, for five cases. E = 1, ,5, 10, 25 and 50
Relevant Equations
Epsilon (stress) = sigma (strain) / E (young's modulus)
du (displacement)/ dx = * E = strain
I have a TA that is ignoring me, so I have to resort to this online forum. Also, a very unhelpful example from lecture (just 1).
I have some other equations, but I don't really know how they all tie together.

I find epsilon = 10um/1mm (both materials are 1 mm in length) = 1E-2mm/mm
sigma 2 = E1*epsilon = 50E7Pa
sigma 1 = E2*epsilon = 10E7Pa

As far as the second part, I thought I did something reasonable, but after rereading it, I realized I missed a crucial part of the problem.
I can provide anything else that you may want to help me understand this homework (in context) since I don't have anyone to explain it to me. Other than the lectures which are very unhelpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What does the fact that your calculated stresses are different imply?
 
  • #3
caz said:
What does the fact that your calculated stresses are different imply?
That my assumption that both materials receive the same displacement, may be wrong?
 
  • #4
Yes. Think about a hard spring and a soft spring in series. If you pull it, the soft spring will extend more.

If the stresses are different at the boundary between the materials, what happens to the boundary?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
caz said:
Stress times cross sectional area is force. So at the boundary between the two materials, the forces are different. What does this mean physically?
That the stress is different between each material?
 
  • #6
I edited my previous comment.

What happens to the boundary if the stresses are different?
 
  • #7
caz said:
I edited my previous comment.

What happens to the boundary if the stresses are different?
oh. ok. now i am starting to catch on. (i am way better at programming than i ever will be at mechanics).
so the total displacement is 10um, but that is distributed between both materials?
 
  • #8
Yes, the displacements are not equally distributed.
 
  • #9
The system is at equilibrium. What does that say about the forces of the boundary?
 
  • #10
caz said:
The system is at equilibrium. What does that say about the forces of the boundary?
Wouldnt that imply that the forces are the same? Or would that be the strain that is the same?
 
  • #11
At equilibrium, the boundary does not move. The is means the net force is 0. This means that the stresses are identical in both materials.

Using this condition, do you see what you need to do?
 
  • #12
caz said:
At equilibrium, the boundary does not move. The is means the net force is 0. This means that the stresses are identical in both materials.
didnt we say that the stresses are different? oh nvm. it was more of a question.
 
  • #13
If you assume that the stresses are identical, do you see how to do the calculation?
Do you understand why they are identical?
 
  • #14
caz said:
If you assume that the stresses are identical, do you see how to do the calculation?
Do you understand why they are identical?
I am confused on how you they are in equilibrium
 
  • #15
Nothing is moving. Therefore there are no accelerations. Therefore there are no net forces.

At the boundary between the materials, each material is pulling the boundary towards itself with a force equal to the stress times the cross-sectional area. (Check your text on how to get the directions correct). This means that the stresses are identical.

Do you understand?
 
  • Like
Likes Nickpga
  • #16
Alright. That makes sense. I suppose I had an imaginary force that caused the displacement. Like someone pulling it
 
  • #17
Yes.

So dtotal=dmat1+dmat2 with the condition that the stresses are identical for mat1 and mat2. Do you see where to go from here?
 
  • #18
Btw, your relevant equation for stress is wrong and you use two different lengths for the total displacement in your first post.
 
  • #19
caz said:
Btw, your relevant equation for stress is wrong and you use two different lengths for the total displacement in your first post.
really? stress = strain/ Y_modulus? Thats the equation the professor boxed and starred
 
  • #20
Stress(sigma)=strain(epsilon)*Y
(Y and stress have the same units)
 
  • #21
caz said:
Stress(sigma)=strain(epsilon)*Y
(Y and stress have the same units)
You know. Thats what happens when the professor can't be be bothered to write legibly. I thought stress was epsilon. and strain sigma.
 
  • #22
The other equation you need is strain=dl/l
 
  • #23
caz said:
The other equation you need is strain=dl/l
I have that one too. I just had it wrong. Thanks a lot for your time and effort in asking me questions to make my mind work.
I wouldn't say I am dumb, I just don't have a mind that thinks 'mechanically'.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #24
Your welcome. New concepts take time to absorb. Be patient.

You seem to know what to do now so I’ll be signing off.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Nickpga

FAQ: What is the relationship between epsilon and sigma in multi-ferroic materials?

What are multi-ferroics?

Multi-ferroics are materials that exhibit both ferromagnetic and ferroelectric properties at the same time. This means they can have both a spontaneous magnetic moment and a spontaneous electric polarization, making them useful for a variety of applications.

How are multi-ferroics different from traditional ferroelectric or ferromagnetic materials?

Traditional ferroelectric or ferromagnetic materials only exhibit one of these properties, while multi-ferroics exhibit both. This makes them unique and potentially more useful for certain applications.

What are some potential applications of multi-ferroics?

Multi-ferroics have potential applications in data storage, sensors, actuators, and energy harvesting devices. They can also be used in microwave and magnetic devices, as well as for creating new types of memory devices.

How are multi-ferroics studied and characterized?

Multi-ferroics are studied using various techniques such as X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, and magnetic and electric measurements. These techniques help to understand the crystal structure, magnetic and electric properties, and how they can be manipulated.

What are the challenges in developing multi-ferroic materials?

One of the main challenges in developing multi-ferroic materials is finding a material that exhibits both ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity at room temperature. Additionally, controlling and manipulating these properties in a predictable and reproducible manner is also a challenge. Further research and development is needed to overcome these challenges and fully utilize the potential of multi-ferroics.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
16K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top