What is the Relationship Between Period and Magnetic Field in a Cyclotron?

In summary: After doing some more research into cyclotrons, I found that the magnetic field does affect the particle's motion. My solution now is:qB=\frac{mv^2}{r} where m is the mass of the particle.
  • #1
TFM
1,026
0

Homework Statement



I am currently writing about Cyclotrons, and want to show how the period is related to the magnetic field.

Homework Equations



[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega} [/tex]

[tex] \omega = \frac{v}{r} [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have rearranged the above formula to give:

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi}{\frac{v}{r}} = \frac{2 \pi r}{v} [/tex]

Now a website now goes onto to say that this is equal to:

[tex] \frac{2 \pi r}{v} = \frac{2\pi mv}{qBv} [/tex]

Now I don't want to just write this down (for a start is plagarism, but anyway), so could anyone recommend some useful laws that mat come in useful?

Thanks in advanced,

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I start with the Lorentz force, and apply that to circular motion (either UCM or accelerated CM) of a charge in a combination of electric and magnetic fields:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force

Hope that helps.
 
  • #3
The charge is held in a circular orbit in a cyclotron because the magnetic force (look up "Lorentz force law") produces an acceleration that is equal to the "centripetal acceleration for uniform circular motion". Look up those.
 
  • #4
Thanks, So Lorentz Force:

[tex] F_{mag} = qv \times B [/tex]

Since these are perpendicular to each other:

[tex] F_{mag} = qvB [/tex]

This is then equal to the Centripetal acceleration:

[tex] a = \frac{v^2}{r} [/tex]

thus centripetal force is:

[tex] F_{cent} = \frac{mv^2}{r} [/tex]

These can thgus be equated when the particle is expirienceing constant circular motion (in the case of the cyclotron in the two 'D' sections):

[tex] F_{mag} = F_{cent} \therefore qvB = \frac{mv^2}{r} [/tex]

From before,

[tex] \omega = \frac{v}{r} [/tex]

this can rearrnge for v,

[tex] v = \omega r [/tex]

Put into equation:

[tex] q \omega r B = \frac{m(\omega r)^2}{r} [/tex]

[tex] q \omega r B = \frac{m \omega^2 r^2}{r} [/tex]

[tex] q \omega r B = m \omega^2 r [/tex]

And, again:

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega} [/tex]

rearranged:

[tex] \omega = \frac{2 \pi}{T} [/tex]

reinsert:

[tex] q \omega r B = m (\frac{2 \pi}{T})^2 r [/tex]

[tex] q \omega r B = m \frac{4 \pi^2}{T^2} r [/tex]

Rearrange to get T:

[tex] T^2 q \omega r B = m 4 \pi^2 r [/tex]

[tex] T^2 = \frac{m 4 \pi^2 r}{q \omega r B} [/tex]

[tex] T = sqrt{\frac{m 4 \pi^2 r}{q \omega r B}} [/tex]

does this look right? I didn't think there was a square root?

TFM
 
  • #5
You seem to be taking algebraic steps that aren't getting you closer to what you want. You are also not cancelling variables when they appear on both sides and keeping way to many related variables around. You were almost done when you wrote qvB=mv^2/r. T=2*pi*r/v. Just solve the first equation for v and substitute into the second. Don't forget to cancel the 'v'. Don't write v=sqrt(rqvB/m). If you do that you haven't really 'solved' for v. There is still one on both sides.
 
  • #6
Thank's, so:

[tex] qvB = \frac{mv^2}{r} [/tex]

this can cancel down to:

[tex] qB = \frac{mv}{r} [/tex]

rearrange for v:

[tex] mv = rqB [/tex]

[tex] v = \frac{rqB}{m} [/tex]

So now we substitute this into:

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi r}{v} [/tex]

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi r}{\frac{rqB}{m}} [/tex]

This can be rearranged into:

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi r m}{rqB} [/tex]

Cancel down the r

[tex] T = \frac{2 \pi m}{qB} [/tex]

This looks a lot better.

Thanks,

TFM
 
  • #7
Nice work TFM. Keep in mind, though, that you simplified the Lorentz force right away to assume no E field. That's okay, but may not be true in the case of the cyclotron (I don't know enough about cyclotrons to know whether that's true or not).
 
  • #8
Well, the Electric field would only be in the gap between the two D sections, which is what accelerates the particles, not in the D sections themselves, so the circular motion in the D sections should not be affected. It also matches up with the formula from here;

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/cyclot.html

Thanks again,

TFM
 

FAQ: What is the Relationship Between Period and Magnetic Field in a Cyclotron?

What is the cyclotron frequency formula?

The cyclotron frequency formula is a mathematical equation used to calculate the frequency at which a charged particle will orbit in a cyclotron, a type of particle accelerator. It is also known as the Larmor frequency.

How is the cyclotron frequency formula derived?

The cyclotron frequency formula is derived from the equations of motion for a charged particle in a magnetic field. It takes into account the strength of the magnetic field, the mass of the particle, and its charge.

What is the significance of the cyclotron frequency formula?

The cyclotron frequency formula is significant because it allows scientists to predict the frequency at which charged particles will orbit in a cyclotron. This is important for the design and operation of particle accelerators, which are used in various fields of research and technology.

Are there any limitations to the cyclotron frequency formula?

Yes, there are limitations to the cyclotron frequency formula. It assumes that the magnetic field is constant and that the charged particles are non-relativistic. In reality, these assumptions may not always hold true, leading to deviations from the predicted frequency.

Can the cyclotron frequency formula be applied to other systems?

Yes, the cyclotron frequency formula can be applied to other systems besides cyclotrons. It can be used to calculate the frequency of a charged particle's orbit in any type of magnetic field, such as in a mass spectrometer or in natural phenomena like the motion of charged particles in Earth's magnetic field.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
818
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
646
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
716
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top