- #1
RicardoMP
- 49
- 2
- Homework Statement
- I'm told to consider the polarization vector $$s_L^\mu=(\gamma \beta, \gamma \vec\beta/\beta)$$, which is longitudinal (##\vec s_L||\vec\beta##, where ##\beta## is the relative velocity in a Lorentz boost), and that I want to show that ##s^\mu_L## satisfies ##s^2=-1##.
- Relevant Equations
- $$s_L^\mu=(\gamma \beta, \gamma \vec\beta/\beta)$$
##s^\mu=(0,\vec s)## and ##|\vec s|=1##
I'm looking forward to have a better understanding of the polarization vector in quantum field theory in order to solve a particular problem.
In class and in several textbooks I see that ##s^\mu=(0,\vec s)## and ##|\vec s|=1##. Are polarizations vectors defined to have no temporal component in Minkowski space and for its modulus to be 1? If I square the longitudinal part I get 0 for which I assume that the only contribution to ##s^2## comes from the transverse part(##s^\mu=s^\mu_L+s^\mu_T##).
How is this polarization vector related to spin and what does it represent in a particle's state?
Thank you and stay safe.
In class and in several textbooks I see that ##s^\mu=(0,\vec s)## and ##|\vec s|=1##. Are polarizations vectors defined to have no temporal component in Minkowski space and for its modulus to be 1? If I square the longitudinal part I get 0 for which I assume that the only contribution to ##s^2## comes from the transverse part(##s^\mu=s^\mu_L+s^\mu_T##).
How is this polarization vector related to spin and what does it represent in a particle's state?
Thank you and stay safe.