- #1
dimensionless
- 462
- 1
In basic acoustic theory a sound source reflects across a boundry in a fasion similar to light. The magnitude of the reflected wave can be determined by adjusting it for the reflection loss and the distance traversed.
I am looking at a scientific paper from the 70's. In it they use the following equation to caculate the magnitude of a wave emanating from an image x meters away.
[tex]
y = \frac {1} {x}
[/tex]
My intuition would tell me that the magnitude of a wave emanating from an image as a function of distance would be described by the following:
[tex]
y = \frac {1} {4 \pi x^2}
[/tex]
Does anyone know if the former equation is really correct? Why is the inverse square law not used?
I am looking at a scientific paper from the 70's. In it they use the following equation to caculate the magnitude of a wave emanating from an image x meters away.
[tex]
y = \frac {1} {x}
[/tex]
My intuition would tell me that the magnitude of a wave emanating from an image as a function of distance would be described by the following:
[tex]
y = \frac {1} {4 \pi x^2}
[/tex]
Does anyone know if the former equation is really correct? Why is the inverse square law not used?
Last edited: