- #36
Les Sleeth
Gold Member
- 2,262
- 2
Originally posted by StephenSwires
Time is the transfer (flow) of energy by matter.
If you do a mental experiment and conceive of time stopped, it requires the cessation of the flow of energy. Everything "freezes" as it is without change.
All effects of time are seen as effects of the flow of energy (aging, etc.).
All sentient physical beings experience and make their observations about the physical universe by the flow of energy within the brain, so the concept of the flow of time is inseperable from the thought process.
The underlying physical law that is labeled the 2nd law of thermodynamics being that energy is transferred from matter with greater energy to matter with lesser energy is the same law that makes time flow in only one direction for all matter and beings made of matter.
I like your take on time, and have nearly the same view with a couple of small differences.
The universe starts with a bang and that was the beginning of time; therefore when/if the universe ceases to exist, so will time. As far as what we actually know, there has never been another universe and there may never be another one. This is it (as far as we know).
From the moment of singularity, the universe has steadily dis-integrated; and as the structure of matter steadily declines, the energy bound up in its organization departs. That "flow" is the key to how long the universe will continue, as you say. The fact that the overall direction of energy flow in our universe is entropic means change overall is too. So again I think you are correct to say change has equivalency to time (overall).
However, the flow of energy is not all there is to it because the rate of flow can change, as SR has demonstrated. So "time" is related to the rate of disappearance of our universe.
Taking into account these points, then rather than saying time is only the flow of energy, one might say, time is the overall rate of entropic flow of energy because once it has all flowed (entropically), time is up! (That is, of course, unless the universe starts anew somehow.)
It's interesting that time is measured by things that cycle. If one considers the absolute most basic cycling things of the universe, it has to be the oscillitory nature of atoms and light. In another thread we've been discussing the loss of energy by EM as the universe expands, and indeed that does affect the rate of EM cycling.
Last edited: