- #1
randa177
- 91
- 1
I have a question that I've been thinking about since February! It might be stupid but for some reason I am not getting it!
So back in February, I was observing with the 4m telescope in Chile, and each night the night assistant at the telescope would say: you reached the hour angle of (...) [I forgot exactly what it was], so you can't observe the object anymore.
I know that of course the objects appear to be moving in the sky, and at a certain time we can't see it anymore. I also know that the hour angle and the ascension add to get the sidereal time... and that is what confuses me,,, why do we need to say: at this hour angle we can't observe anymore, instead of just saying at this time we can't observe this object anymore... what new information does the hour angle tells us? Because I assume that the maximum hour angle we can reach every night is different because the time would be different, so why do we use the HA instead of the actual time?
So back in February, I was observing with the 4m telescope in Chile, and each night the night assistant at the telescope would say: you reached the hour angle of (...) [I forgot exactly what it was], so you can't observe the object anymore.
I know that of course the objects appear to be moving in the sky, and at a certain time we can't see it anymore. I also know that the hour angle and the ascension add to get the sidereal time... and that is what confuses me,,, why do we need to say: at this hour angle we can't observe anymore, instead of just saying at this time we can't observe this object anymore... what new information does the hour angle tells us? Because I assume that the maximum hour angle we can reach every night is different because the time would be different, so why do we use the HA instead of the actual time?