What is the simplified form of the sum with changed variables?

  • Thread starter benorin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sum
In summary, the conversation discusses the derivation of the basic combinatorial identity involving a sum of binomial coefficients and a power series. The conversation eventually leads to using a change of variables and the derivative of the geometric series to simplify the sum.
  • #1
benorin
Homework Helper
Insights Author
1,443
191
I think I should know this already, but I don't; yet I need it, so would you please help me sum this...

[tex]\sum_{n=k}^{\infty} \left(\begin{array}{c}n\\k\end{array}\right) \left( \frac{-z}{1-z}\right) ^{n} = (1-z)(-z)^{k}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's surely easier to look at:

[tex]
f(x) = \sum_{n=k}^{+\infty} \binom{n}{k} x^n
[/tex]

This is one of the basic combinatorial identities, but I must admit that I have forgotten it, and do not recall how to derive it. :frown:

Hrm, maybe comparing f(x) to the integral of f(x)/x will help?

Also, I notice that the k-th derivative of x^n is:

[tex]
\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^k \left( x^n \right) = \frac{k!}{x^k} \binom{n}{k} x^n
[/tex]

Oh, I think that does it. (Note that, in your sum, you may assume that n ranges over all nonnegative integers)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I was first thinking to look at derivatives of the left-hand side, and show that it too is a polynomial of degree k+1 with 0 being a zero of order k, but having no other zeroes where its defined (since its other zero would have to be at 1, but it's not defined there). However, the derivatives just got messy, so I couldn't make this work. The other idea was to express 1/(1-z) on the left as (1 + z + z² + ...). That turns the series on the left into a power series in z. It's easy to check that the resulting power series has 0's for coefficients of all powers of z before the kth power. It's easy to check also that the kth power of z has coefficient (-1)k and that the k+1th power of z has coefficient (-1)k+1.

Somehow, you want to show that the rest have coefficient zero as well. Perhaps you can find a general expression for the jth coefficient in terms of previous coefficients, and solve by method of undetermined coefficients (inductively assuming something about the coefficients). Or maybe you can deal with the derivatives and show that the k+2th derivative is identically 0.
 
  • #5
Never mind, Hurkyl's way works better. Change variables x = -z/(1-z).

[tex]\sum_{n=k}^{\infty} {{n}\choose{k}} \left( \frac{-z}{1-z}\right) ^n[/tex]

[tex] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{{n}\choose{k}} \left( \frac{-z}{1-z}\right) ^n[/tex]

[tex] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{{n}\choose{k}} x^n[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{x^k}{k!}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{k!}{x^k}{{n}\choose{k}} x^n [/tex]

[tex]= \frac{x^k}{k!}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^k(x^n) [/tex]

[tex]= \frac{x^k}{k!}\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^k\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^n[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{x^k}{k!}\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^k\left(\frac{1}{1-x}\right)[/tex]
 

FAQ: What is the simplified form of the sum with changed variables?

What is "This ought to be an easy sum" referring to?

"This ought to be an easy sum" is a phrase that is commonly used to describe a problem or task that is expected to be simple or straightforward to solve or complete.

Why is this phrase often used in scientific contexts?

Scientists often use this phrase to describe a problem or task that is expected to have a clear and logical solution based on existing knowledge and data.

What does this phrase imply about the level of difficulty of the problem or task?

This phrase implies that the problem or task is not complex or challenging, and can be easily solved or completed with minimal effort or resources.

Is this phrase always accurate in scientific research?

No, this phrase may not always accurately describe the level of difficulty of a problem or task in scientific research. Some problems may initially seem easy, but may require more complex approaches or further investigation to fully understand and solve.

Are there any alternative phrases that can be used to describe a difficult problem in scientific research?

Yes, there are many alternative phrases that can be used to describe a difficult problem in scientific research such as "a challenging puzzle", "a complex equation", or "a difficult question". It is important to accurately describe the level of difficulty and complexity of a problem in scientific research to avoid underestimating the effort and resources needed to solve it.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
949
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
978
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top