- #1
nburns
- 32
- 3
What is the neutrino field? How much of what we know about neutrinos is adequately explained by theory?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Last edited:
nburns said:Sorry for the vague question. These fascinating particles don't seem to generate much literature. Is it because of a lack of experimental results?
It seems that these particles could be the key to a lot of new physics, if they were better understood.
nburns said:Is there reading material you could point me to, please?
nburns said:These fascinating particles don't seem to generate much literature. Is it because of a lack of experimental results?.
phinds said:There are several neutrino detectors around the world. There's one in Japan in particular, but I can't remember the name. I suggest Googling "neutrino detectors" to start with
Vanadium 50 said:No, it's because it's not true.
There were 1433 papers with the word "neutrino" in the title in 2011.
nburns said:As far as I know, the state of knowledge is still that neutrinos appear to have mass, but also appear to travel at the speed of light.
jtbell said:Their mass is so small that their speed is so close to the speed of light that the difference is undetectable.
nburns said:As far as I know, the state of knowledge is still that neutrinos appear to have mass, but also appear to travel at the speed of light. And there is no way to reconcile these two things with existing theory.
nburns said:That explanation sounds a little bit too convenient. I believe that there has to be a more satisfying answer.
jtbell said:Their mass is so small that their speed is so close to the speed of light that the difference is undetectable.
nburns said:That explanation sounds a little bit too convenient. I believe that there has to be a more satisfying answer.
Vanadium 50 said:That's false.
On PF we discourage the style of learning where one person makes a parade of false statements to be corrected by others. We find it ineffective and many people find it irritating. Asking questions by asking questions just works better than asking questions by making incorrect statements.
Given a particle's energy and mass, we can calculate its velocity - that's true whether the particle is a neutrino, a brick, or a planet. It just so happens that for neutrinos of detectable energy, this works out to very, very, very close to the speed of light. You may wish that the difference were bigger, of course, but it is what it is.
jtbell said:The last time I tried it, I got a speed which was identical with c out to more than ten decimal places. (I can't seem to turn up that thread at the moment, though. It was sometime during the past year.)
nburns said:I'm not capable of doing the calculations. But that explanation doesn't ring true for me.
jtbell said:Look up the energies of the neutrinos used in these experiments, and the current estimates of their masses. Find the momentum from
$$E^2 = \sqrt {(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2}$$
and the speed from
$$\frac{v}{c} = \frac{pc}{E}$$
The last time I tried it, I got a speed which was identical with c out to more than ten decimal places. (I can't seem to turn up that thread at the moment, though. It was sometime during the past year.)
Vanadium 50 said:The thing about science is that if you can't do the calculation, you don't get to have an opinion. This isn't "I like broccoli" where everyone's opinion is equal. In science, everyone's opinion is not equal - it has to be based on facts.
nburns said:Agreed. But the calculations are based on assumptions, and those assumptions could prove false.
I'm going to stop pretending to be more of an expert than I am and leave it at that. I'll remain skeptical until the data are all in and then I'll accept the outcome, whatever that is. It doesn't look to me like it will be resolved for at least a few more years.
Well, neutrinos don't travel at the speed of light. No particle with mass can do that.I'm not capable of doing the calculations. But that explanation doesn't ring true for me. I think that would be the first known case of a particle traveling at almost the speed of light because it almost doesn't have mass. All the other ones either do or don't.
And what would a "satisfying explanation" be, in your opinion? Are you trying to disprove special relativity?The explanation doesn't feel very satisfying, though, does it?
kloptok said:On another note, there are definitely unsolved questions regarding neutrinos. But these do not concern the fact that a particle with a small mass would travel very close to the speed of light. Unsolved problems in neutrino physics are for example whether there is cp-violation in the lepton sector, if there are right-handed, sterile, neutrinos and whether the neutrino is a majorana particle or not.
kloptok said:And what assumptions are you talking about in this case? It has been experimentally established that neutrinos have a very, very tiny mass (tiny in comparison to all other known elementary particles). Given this we can calculate the speed of the neutrino as a function of its energy via well established relativistic formulae. It so happens that when we do this the speed is very, very close to the speed of light.
From the same formulae also follow that a massless particle will travel at the speed of light, so it's not very strange in my opinion that a particle with a very small mass travels very close to the speed of light.
As a scientist you have to be skeptical of experimentally unfounded assumptions and conjectures, that much is true. But in the case of the formulae in special relativity giving the speed of a particle we are talking about experimentally well established results that no physicist would argue about to the current experimental accuracy. The thing is that you haven't "accepted the outcome, whatever it was", you have instead disregarded it as based on possibly false assumptions.
Well, neutrinos don't travel at the speed of light. No particle with mass can do that.
And what would a "satisfying explanation" be, in your opinion? Are you trying to disprove special relativity?
A neutrino field is a theoretical concept in particle physics that describes the behavior and interactions of neutrinos. It is a fundamental field that exists throughout the universe and is believed to be responsible for the creation and propagation of neutrinos.
The neutrino field is unique because it is an extremely weakly interacting field, meaning that neutrinos rarely interact with other particles. This makes it difficult to study and detect neutrinos, but also allows them to travel long distances without being affected by other particles.
The neutrino field is a crucial component of the Standard Model, which is the current theory that describes the fundamental particles and their interactions. It is used to explain the behavior of neutrinos and their interactions with other particles.
Scientists study the neutrino field through experiments that involve detecting and measuring neutrinos. This can be done through large detectors, such as the Super-Kamiokande in Japan, or through more specialized experiments like the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole.
The neutrino field plays a crucial role in our understanding of the universe, as it is believed to have been present in the early stages of the universe and may hold clues to the formation and evolution of the universe. Additionally, studying the neutrino field can help us better understand the properties and behavior of matter and antimatter.