I What is the spin-boson model for decoherence in a Penning trap?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decoherence
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I read a bit about decoherence lately (I made a post few weeks ago about it and got some reading suggestions) and I would like to try to apply it to a practical situation I need, which is a Penning trap with a single ion at the center. For now I would like to account just for the decoherence due to the black body radiation and as far as I understand the spin-boson model would be the right one for this (at least to start with). However that involves certain coupling constant which I am not sure how to approximate for my given setup. Can someone point me towards some reading about this or previous calculations made for a (cylindrical) Penning trap such that I can start from there? Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Twigg, gentzen and asd789
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the slow and short reply.

I'm not 100% sure how to calculate the decoherence rate, but I can tell you that the blackbody radiation shifts the energy difference ##E_e - E_g## by ##\delta E = (\alpha_e - \alpha_g) \| \vec{E}_{BBR} \|^2## where ##\alpha_{e,g}## is the polarizability of the ground (excited) state (at a particular frequency). This is for Stark shifted qubit states. There is an analogous expression for Zeeman states. You can get ##\| \vec{E}_{BBR} \|^2## from Planck's law for blackbody radiation (spectral irradiance) and your trap's geometry.

My gut feeling is that you can get the decoherence rate by taking the variance of this blackbody frequency shift (##\gamma = \sigma_\nu##, same idea as when you calculate the coherence time of a laser from bandwidth). Thus, the decoherence rate would bee $$\gamma = |\alpha_e - \alpha_g| \sqrt{\langle \| \vec{E}_{BBR} \|^4 \rangle - \langle \| \vec{E}_{BBR} \|^2 \rangle^2}$$ The quadratic term can be calculated from the blackbody partition function by looking at the expectation value of energy squared (just as you do when you calculate energy fluctuations in an ideal gas from the heat capacity).

Does that make sense?
 
Also, I'm not sure which "spin-boson model" you're referring to. Is there a paper you're reading that you can link us to?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
8K
Back
Top