What is the stability proof for a PI controller in a formation flying system?

In summary, the conversation discusses the design of a controller for two satellites flying in formation. The controller, using a proportional integral method, measures the along track position between the satellites and provides thrust values to maintain the formation. A stability proof is needed for the nonlinear equations governing the system and suggestions are given for guaranteed performance and stability analysis using locus plots and understanding of ODE and Laplace transform.
  • #1
fernandoz
1
0
I have two satellites flying in formation geverned by the equations of motion including J2 and drag. Now, one of the satellites has more drag than the other so they become appart. I designed a controller (proportional integral) which meassures the along track position between them and gives Thrust values so the error, which is the difference in the along ttrack position between different orbits, will be zero (that means they will still fly in formation)
I have to give a stability proof for the controller, someone can help me? (the equations governing the system are nonlinear, of course).

thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are various techniques to design a controller. If you want guaranteed performance try searching for Ragazzini's method and of course I'm assuming you are trying to design a discrete controller.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
If you insists on using a PI controller to see if it's stable you'll have to get the locus plot of the system (plant + controller) and see where the poles are located in the s-plane.

If you are puzzled as to why the poles' locations determine stability then you'll have to study ODE (as a good starting point) and its connection to Laplace transform.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: What is the stability proof for a PI controller in a formation flying system?

What is a stability proof of controller?

A stability proof of controller is a mathematical analysis that demonstrates that a control system will maintain stability and performance under various conditions, such as changes in the system dynamics or disturbances. It is an important step in designing and implementing a reliable control system.

Why is a stability proof of controller important?

A stability proof of controller is important because it ensures that the control system will behave as expected and maintain stability and performance. This is crucial for systems that require precise and accurate control, such as in aerospace, automotive, and industrial applications.

How is the stability of a controller determined?

The stability of a controller is determined by analyzing the closed-loop system's transfer function and checking for stability criteria, such as the Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion or the Nyquist stability criterion. These criteria help determine the stability margins of the system and ensure that the system will remain stable under various conditions.

What are the common methods used for stability proof of controller?

Some common methods used for stability proof of controller include Lyapunov stability analysis, frequency domain analysis, and state-space analysis. These methods use different mathematical tools and techniques to analyze the stability of a control system and provide insight into the system's stability margins.

Can a controller be unstable even with a stability proof?

Yes, in some cases, a controller can still be unstable even with a stability proof. This can happen if the system dynamics change significantly or if there are unforeseen disturbances that were not accounted for in the stability proof. Therefore, it is important to regularly test and validate the performance of a control system to ensure its stability in real-world conditions.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top