What motivates famous mathematicians?

In summary, famous mathematicians are often motivated by a combination of intellectual curiosity, the pursuit of knowledge, the challenge of solving complex problems, and the desire to contribute to humanity's understanding of the universe. They are driven by passion for their field, the joy of discovery, and the influence their work can have on future generations. Additionally, collaboration with peers and the recognition of their contributions can further inspire their dedication to mathematics.
  • #1
themasterchief
1
0
TL;DR Summary
Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.
Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
themasterchief said:
TL;DR Summary: Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.

Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
I think this guy enjoyed his mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Erdős
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and FactChecker
  • #3
themasterchief said:
TL;DR Summary: Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.

Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
The problem is less the attitude as it is the toolbox! A wise man once told me, "You might have a brilliant idea at night, but you need to sit down and work on it in the morning!" The working part is crucial, and to work efficiently, you need a big toolbox, the bigger the better. This frequently occurs to me when I read Tao's blog and his theorems. It is playing with ideas at first glance, but a closer look reveals the incredible background that he has where he takes the proof techniques from. Playing with an idea is one thing, knowing possible theorems and techniques that could be applicable is another.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Bosko, pinball1970 and FactChecker

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top