What other methods can be used to integrate e^xlog(x)?

  • Thread starter FedEx
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integrate
In summary, the author solved a sum using integration by parts and then used series expansion of e^x to get the same result.
  • #1
FedEx
318
0
[tex]\int e^xlog(x)[/tex]

I have solved this sum using integration by parts. The answer which i get is

[tex]e^xlogx - logx - \sum^{\infty}_{i=1}\frac{x^i}{(i)(i!)}[/tex]

But i also used the series expansion of e^x. Is there any other way of doing this sum?

I have almost tried out every single way of doing this sum by parts. So better think about substitution or any other possible method other then by parts.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
substitute e^x=u, you get e^xdx=du, dx=du/u, you can fill the blanks by your own.
 
  • #3
If you know that [itex]\int ln x dx= x ln x - x+ C[/itex], which you can do by integration by parts, then it is easy to take u= ex, dv= ln x and use integration by parts.
 
  • #4
loop quantum gravity said:
substitute e^x=u, you get e^xdx=du, dx=du/u, you can fill the blanks by your own.

But on doing so we will get

[tex] log(log u) du [/tex] to integrate. And i did integrate that but i had to use series expansion of e^x.
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy said:
If you know that [itex]\int ln x dx= x ln x - x+ C[/itex], which you can do by integration by parts, then it is easy to take u= ex, dv= ln x and use integration by parts.

I am sorry but i am not able to get you.

Integration of log x is simple. Here what do you mean by dv? Me being in India have a slight of different version of notations. Do you mean that we take log x as the second function? I have tried that but i get

[tex] xe^xlogx [/tex] to integrate. Which i am unable to do
 
  • #6
loop quantum gravity said:
substitute e^x=u, you get e^xdx=du, dx=du/u, you can fill the blanks by your own.
That's probably what the OP did, with one error.

HallsofIvy said:
If you know that [itex]\int ln x dx= x ln x - x+ C[/itex], which you can do by integration by parts, then it is easy to take u= ex, dv= ln x and use integration by parts.
How does this help?

FedEx said:
[tex]\int e^xlog(x)[/tex]

I have solved this sum using integration by parts. The answer which i get is

[tex]e^xlogx + \frac{1}{x^2} - \sum^{\infty}_{i=1}\frac{x^i}{(i)(i!)}[/tex]
That looks good except for one term. Could you show your derivation?

This integral does not have a solution in the elementary functions. In other words, the only way to express the integral is to use either series as you have done or to use some special function. If you choose the appropriate values for u and dv, you will get a rather widely used special function in one step.

Note: I'm not saying you should use that particular special function. Your instructor may well want the series representation.
 
  • #7
D H said:
If you choose the appropriate values for u and dv, you will get a rather widely used special function in one step.

I am not able to get this.

Take

[tex] x= log\alpha[/tex]

By parts i get

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \int\frac{d\alpha}{log\alpha}[/tex]

let [tex] log\alpha = \beta[/tex]

we get

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \int\frac{e^{\beta}d\beta}{\beta}[/tex]

Then i apply series and integrate

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \frac{1}{{\beta}^2} - \beta - \frac{{\beta}^2}{(2)(2!)} - \frac{{\beta}^3}{(3)(3!)} ...[/tex]

Now bringing it back in x
[tex]
e^xlogx -logx - \sum^{\infty}_{i=1}\frac{x^i}{(i)(i!)}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #8
FedEx said:
Take

[tex] x= log\alpha[/tex]

By parts i get

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \int\frac{d\alpha}{log\alpha}[/tex]

let [tex] log\alpha = \beta[/tex]

we get

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \int\frac{e^{\beta}d\beta}{\beta}[/tex]
Wow. That was a hard way to get to this result. Look at what you have done. [itex]\beta[/itex] is just [itex]x[/itex]. You assigned [itex] x= \log\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\log\alpha = \beta[/itex]. By transitivity, [itex]\beta=x[/itex].

Since you arrived at this result the hard way, here's an easy way: Integrate by parts directly.

Let

[tex]\aligned
u&=\log x &\quad dv &=e^x dx \\
du &= \frac {dx}x & \quad v &= e^x \endaligned[/tex]

Thus

[tex]\int e^x\log x dx = e^x\log x - \int \frac{e^x}{x} dx[/tex]

Then i apply series and integrate

[tex] \alpha log(log\alpha) - \frac{1}{{\beta}^2} - \beta - \frac{{\beta}^2}{(2)(2!)} - \frac{{\beta}^3}{(3)(3!)} ...[/tex]
Too fast! Where does the [itex]1/beta^2[/itex] come from?
 
  • #9
Ya.I saw it at last while putting back the values in terms of x.

[tex] \frac{e^{\beta}}{\beta} = \frac{{1} + \beta + \frac{{\beta}^2}{2!} + \frac{{\beta}^3}{3!} + ...}{\beta}[/tex]

Then i integrated it.
 
  • #10
What is the integral of 1/beta? (Hint: It is not 1/beta2).
 
  • #11
Oh my god. How can this happen. I am so sorry. I am a fool. Its

[tex] log{\beta} [/tex]

I am so sorry. I a ashamed of myself. May be its because i am ill at the moment. However illness has nothing to do with it this is just because of my mere lack of concentration
 
  • #12
Naw. You just made a dumb mistake. We all make dumb mistakes. In general, admit it (eat some crow) and move on. Crow can be a tasty dish at times.

Now that you have the answer in series form, there is a way to express it without a series using the "exponential integral":

[tex]\textrm{Ei}(x) \equiv \int_{-\infty}^x \frac {e^t}t dt[/tex]
 
  • #13
D H said:
Naw. You just made a dumb mistake. We all make dumb mistakes. In general, admit it (eat some crow) and move on. Crow can be a tasty dish at times.

Now that you have the answer in series form, there is a way to express it without a series using the "exponential integral":

[tex]\textrm{Ei}(x) \equiv \int_{-\infty}^x \frac {e^t}t dt[/tex]

Thanks for the consolation.

So you mean that the sigma and the log x term can be replaced by the exponential integral, isn't it?
 
  • #14
Yes, but if you haven't covered special functions yet your instructor probably wants to see the series representation.
 
  • #15
Thanks a lot D H. You really helped me with the sum
 

FAQ: What other methods can be used to integrate e^xlog(x)?

What is the formula for integrating ({e^x}logx)?

The formula for integrating ({e^x}logx) is ∫e^x logx dx = (e^x(logx-1))/2 + C, where C is the constant of integration.

What is the process for integrating ({e^x}logx)?

The process for integrating ({e^x}logx) involves using the integration by parts method, where u = logx and dv/dx = e^x. This will result in the formula ∫e^x logx dx = uv - ∫v du, where u and v are the original u and dv/dx values.

Can ({e^x}logx) be integrated using substitution?

No, ({e^x}logx) cannot be integrated using substitution alone. It requires the integration by parts method as mentioned above.

What is the domain and range of the function ({e^x}logx)?

The domain of ({e^x}logx) is all positive real numbers, since logx is undefined for negative numbers. The range of ({e^x}logx) is also all positive real numbers, since e^x is always positive and logx can take on any value less than 1.

What is the significance of the function ({e^x}logx) in mathematics?

The function ({e^x}logx) is often used in mathematical models and calculations related to growth and decay, as it combines the exponential growth of e^x with the logarithmic decay of logx. It is also commonly used in physics and engineering, particularly in the fields of thermodynamics and fluid mechanics.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
908
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top