- #1
anubodh
- 51
- 0
I want to know that how much idling occurs at redlights (in percent) out of the total idling done at various times and places?
anubodh said:I want to know that how much idling occurs at redlights (in percent) out of the total idling done at various times and places?
It is route-dependent, e.g., the length and number of lights, in conjunction with traffic density and scheduling of the lights.anubodh said:Can you tell on an average like more than or less than x%?
BobG said:The actual question was to compare idling at red lights to idling for other situations (not what percent of the morning commute was spent idling).
If each car in the
United States idles just 6 minutes per day, about 3 billion gallons of
fuel are wasted annually, costing drivers $10 billion.
Depends if the gender, I find men spend a lot of time idling at red lights :roll eyes: To answer the second part of your question, especially after midnight in Amsterdam.anubodh said:I want to know that how much idling occurs at redlights (in percent) out of the total idling done at various times and places?
Monique said:Depends if the gender, I find men spend a lot of time idling at red lights :roll eyes: To answer the second part of your question, especially after midnight in Amsterdam.
All I needed to do was look out the windowI like Serena said:Hold on!
If you have found this, how much time did you idle around those red lights? ;)
anubodh said:At some sites it is written that idling wastes around 3 billion dollars in us but at this site
http://www.fieldtechnologies.com/us-drivers-waste-155-billion-dollars-a-year-idling-in-traffic/
It is written that 155 billion dollars are wasted.
So, can anyone tell how much is actually wasted (approx)
Instead, they use a type of 12-volt battery called an absorbed glass mat (AGM) battery. The electrolyte is contained in thin woven glass mats rather than flooding the cells as in a typical "wet" battery. It also is pressurized for a greater power density.
AGM batteries' advantage over conventional 12-volt lead-acid batteries is that they recharge up to five times faster and can be deeply discharged with no damage. Those are essential characteristics for a battery that's being called on to start and restart a vehicle's engine scores of times a day.
I've been at a redlight in a line so long that the light turns green, then turns red, then turns green again before I actually get to move. I'm actually moving from that first green light. So to actually get through the intersection, it took probably 20 minutes. Something needs to be done about traffic. It almost makes you not want to bother leaving the house in your car. I hate driving mainly because of the people on the road being psychopaths, but also because of traffic. I won't go out some days because the reward of going out doesn't outweigh the grief of driving there and back.The thing that really bugs me about red lights is the lag time. By that I meant that when the light turns green the first vehicle starts to move fairly quickly (or receive the wrath of a horn blower in vehicle number two).
On the other hand we all have noticed that by the time vehicle number 20 starts to move (that would be me) the light turns red again before I get to the intersection.
leroyjenkens said:I've been at a redlight in a line so long that the light turns green, then turns red, then turns green again before I actually get to move. I'm actually moving from that first green light. So to actually get through the intersection, it took probably 20 minutes. Something needs to be done about traffic. It almost makes you not want to bother leaving the house in your car. I hate driving mainly because of the people on the road being psychopaths, but also because of traffic. I won't go out some days because the reward of going out doesn't outweigh the grief of driving there and back.
I don't quite understamd the problem there. In the UK the standard solution is to look out of the windows to see what the other traffic is doingedward said:When that first car stopped at a light starts to move car number 15 needs to know about it.
That's just an advertisement, it's not real, there is nothing to back that up, disregard it.anubodh said:At some sites it is written that idling wastes around 3 billion dollars in us but at this site
http://www.fieldtechnologies.com/us-drivers-waste-155-billion-dollars-a-year-idling-in-traffic/
It is written that 155 billion dollars are wasted.
So, can anyone tell how much is actually wasted (approx)
Idling at red lights can contribute to air pollution by releasing harmful emissions into the environment. It also contributes to climate change by increasing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The amount of fuel wasted by idling at red lights varies depending on the type of vehicle and the length of time spent idling. On average, idling for 10 seconds uses the same amount of fuel as restarting the engine.
It is generally better to turn off your engine if you anticipate being stopped at a red light for more than 10 seconds. This can save fuel and reduce emissions. However, constantly restarting your engine can also put wear on the starter and battery, so it is important to find a balance.
Idling at red lights can provide a brief break for your vehicle's engine, allowing it to cool down before resuming driving. This can be beneficial for older vehicles. Additionally, idling can provide a source of warmth in colder climates.
One way to reduce idling time at red lights is to anticipate when the light will turn green and begin accelerating before it changes. This can also improve fuel efficiency. Other ways include carpooling or taking public transportation to reduce the number of vehicles on the road and implementing traffic signal synchronization to reduce the amount of time spent at red lights.