What To Project Upon When Doing QM Measurements?

  • #1
flyusx
36
0
Homework Statement
Let's say we have a set of eigenvalues for a Hamiltonian of a system: h1, h2 and h3 where the eigenvectors are |h1>, |h2> and |h3>. Let's also say we have another operator of a system A (non-commuting with the Hamiltonian) where its eigenvalues are a1, a2 and a3 with eigenvectors |a1>, |a2> and |a3>.
Relevant Equations
$$P(a)=\langle frac{|\langle a|ψ\rangle|^{2}}{\langleψ|ψ\rangle}$$
I have read that if one measures the Hamiltonian and receives a value of h2, then the quantum state will be in ##|h2\rangle##. Finding the probability of a1 is done by projecting ##|a1\rangle## upon ##|h2\rangle## divided by ##\langle h2|h2\rangle##. In other words: $$\frac{|\langle a1|h2\rangle|^{2}}{\langle h2|h2\rangle}$$

I have also seen elsewhere that if we are given a state ##|ψ\rangle## with the Hamiltonian and operator A, then measuring h2 will change the quantum state into a new state ##|ψ'\rangle## given by ##|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle##. To find the probability of a1, the textbook explicitly projects ##|a1\rangle## upon ##|ψ'\rangle## and not ##|h2\rangle##. In other words: $$\frac{|\langle a1|ψ'\rangle|^{2}}{\langleψ'|ψ'\rangle}$$

When I expand both out, I get the same answer:
$$\frac{|\langle a1|ψ'\rangle|^{2}}{\langleψ'|ψ'\rangle}=\frac{\langleψ'|a1\rangle\langle a1|ψ'\rangle}{\langleψ'|ψ'\rangle}=\frac{\langleψ|h2\rangle\langle h2|a1\rangle\langle a1|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle}{\langleψ|h2\rangle\langle h2|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle}=\frac{|\langle a1|h2\rangle|^{2}}{\langle h2|h2\rangle}$$

I see that both methods work, but I'm confused as to whether the quantum state is left in ##|h2\rangle## or ##|ψ'\rangle## after measuring an energy (eigenvalue) of h2. When solving a measurement problem, is there a reason to calculate ##|ψ'\rangle## after measuring H, then using that for calculations with A? Or is it always reasonable to say that a state is in ##|h2\rangle## if h2 is measured, and then use ##|h2\rangle## for further calculations with A?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I much prefer to work with normalized kets only, so I don't like the ##\ket{\psi'} = \ket{h2}\braket{h2 | \psi}## approach, which results in an unnormalized ##\ket{\psi'}##.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #3
I completely agree (especially since we don't need the <ψ|ψ> at the bottom). But both ways are valid, right? Some problems I work out use one method and other problems use the other, so I just want to make sure I'm not just assuming two methods are identical.
 
  • #4
flyusx said:
I have also seen elsewhere that if we are given a state ##|ψ\rangle## with the Hamiltonian and operator A, then measuring h2 will change the quantum state into a new state ##|ψ'\rangle## given by ##|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle##.

'seen elsewhere' is vague. Where ?

'A new state ##|ψ'\rangle## given by ##|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle## ' would be unnormalized, right ?

##\ ##
 
  • #5
From Zettili's QM textbook, I have seen the |ψ'> representation used to solve Problem 3.8 whereas Problem 3.7 doesn't use this method. I've attached a PDF file of those two problems.

In Problem 3.7(b), he projects each ##a## state onto ##\|φ_2\rangle## since that's the eigenvector associated with ##-\varepsilon_0##. In 3.8(b,c) he uses |ψ'> (though he names it |φ>,|χ>), perhaps since the original state was not normalised. But I do agree that normalised kets are always easier to work with.
 

Attachments

  • ZettiliQM.pdf
    145.9 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
  • #6
flyusx said:
I completely agree (especially since we don't need the <ψ|ψ> at the bottom). But both ways are valid, right? Some problems I work out use one method and other problems use the other, so I just want to make sure I'm not just assuming two methods are identical.
Yes.
 
  • #7
So if a state ##|ψ\rangle## is measured and a value h2 is recorded, the state will be in ##|ψ'\rangle=|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle##? But the probability calculation is identical when calculating with ##|h2\rangle##?
 
  • #8
flyusx said:
So if a state ##|ψ\rangle## is measured and a value h2 is recorded, the state will be in ##|ψ'\rangle=|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle##? But the probability calculation is identical when calculating with ##|h2\rangle##?
##|ψ'\rangle=|h2\rangle\langle h2|ψ\rangle## is nothing but ##|ψ'\rangle= c |h2\rangle## with ##c## some complex number. Physical states are defined up to an arbitrary complex scalar constant, so it is the same state.
 
  • #9
Ah, so they're identical with the exception of a constant (the inner product of h2 and ψ).
 
  • #10
flyusx said:
Ah, so they're identical with the exception of a constant (the inner product of h2 and ψ).
Correct. It will be useful to remember that ##\braket{|}## correspond to complex numbers and can be moved around equations as needed.
 

FAQ: What To Project Upon When Doing QM Measurements?

What is the significance of the basis in quantum measurements?

The basis in quantum measurements determines the set of possible outcomes for the measurement. When you project a quantum state onto a particular basis, you are effectively choosing the properties you want to measure. The results will correspond to the eigenvalues of the operator associated with that basis.

How do I choose the appropriate basis for a quantum measurement?

The choice of basis depends on the physical property you are interested in measuring. For instance, if you want to measure the spin of a particle along the z-axis, you would choose the eigenstates of the spin operator in the z direction. Similarly, for position measurements, you would choose the position eigenstates as your basis.

What happens if I measure in a basis that is not aligned with the state vector?

If you measure in a basis that is not aligned with the state vector, the quantum state will collapse to one of the basis states, and the probability of each outcome is given by the square of the amplitude of the state vector's projection onto that basis state. This is a direct consequence of the Born rule in quantum mechanics.

Can I change the measurement basis after preparing the quantum state?

Yes, you can change the measurement basis after preparing the quantum state. However, doing so will generally alter the probabilities of different measurement outcomes. The new measurement basis can be chosen to align with different observables, and the quantum state will be projected accordingly during the measurement process.

What is the role of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum measurements?

In quantum measurements, eigenvalues represent the possible outcomes of the measurement, while eigenvectors (or eigenstates) represent the states the system can collapse into upon measurement. When you measure an observable, the quantum state collapses to one of the eigenstates of the corresponding operator, and the measurement result is the associated eigenvalue.

Back
Top