What Went Wrong in Solving the Energy Equation Problem?

  • Thread starter Ut Prosim
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Energy
In summary, the 10kg block has an initial velocity of 2m/s at the bottom of the ramp and slides up the ramp with a constant applied horizontal force of F=75N. The maximum height h that the block can reach on the ramp is found to be .249m.
  • #1
Ut Prosim
4
0

Homework Statement



The 10kg block has an initial velocity of 2m/s at the bottom of the ramp and slides up the ramp with a constant applied horizontal force F=75N as shown. Find the maximum height h that the block can reach on the ramp.

We're using cos(theta/%)=.8 & sin(theta/%)=.6

help-1.jpg


m=10kg | V1=2m/s | F=75N | Y2=? | Y1=0 | coefficient of friction(#)= .4

Homework Equations



K1 + Ug1+ Ue1+ W'1-2= K2 + Ug2 + Ue2

The Attempt at a Solution



K1= .5m(V1)2 V1=2 ==20
K2= .5m(V2)2 V2=0 ==0
Ug1= mgY1 Y1=0 ==0
Ug2= mgY2 = 98Y2

(elastics are 0)

W'1-2
= WF+Wf
= [-#*mgcos(%)*(y2/sin(%))] + [Fcos(%)*(Y2/sin(%))]
=[(-.4)(10)(9.8)(.8)*(Y2/.6)] + [(75)(.8)*(Y2/.6)]
=47.733Y2Energy Equation:

20+0+0+47.733Y2 = 0 + 98Y2 + 0
Y2=.398
BUT the answer is .249m.

If you could review my work, and help me find out where I went wrong, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well... I don't get your answer, and I also don't get 0.249 m. The difference between my answer and yours comes from the energy equation and they way work is calculated. It looks like in your equation, the work done by friction helps and the work done by the external force hurts...

But like I said, I still don't get 0.249 m. It's always possible that I'm doing something wrong, too:smile:.

Also, it helps to use LaTeX for readability (it's hard to look at % and #... especially when you know it could be [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\mu[/tex]). I might be nitpicking, but I also like to use the same variables that you're given in the problem. If it asks you to solve for h, why change it to [tex]Y_{2}[/tex]?

-Kerry
 
  • #3
The work done by friction hurts, hence it has negative mu . I just have them switched in the addition problem above.

I have no clue what LaTeX is, although I see when I try to copy and paste your mu, LaTeX Code: \\mu, it shows up as an odd code. I'm new to these forums and have not been introduced to this character code.
 
  • #4
I don't think you have enough terms. Also I think solving for the distance up the ramp is the way to go and then figure the h after you know how far up it goes.

To do this figure the net force on the block on the ramp:

Total-F = Applied-F*Cosθ - mg*sinθ - Friction-F

First determine what's happening with the first 2 forces.

75*.8 - 98*.6 = 1.2 N - friction

Now Friction is

μ*(75*sinθ + 98*cosθ) = .4(75*.6 + 98*.8) = 49.36

Net Force then = 1.2 - 49.36 = -48.16

From your force now you have the deceleration and can figure the distance by

V2 = 2*a*x

Then just figure h from x.
 
  • #5
Ut Prosim said:
The work done by friction hurts, hence it has negative mu . I just have them switched in the addition problem above.

I have no clue what LaTeX is, although I see when I try to copy and paste your mu, LaTeX Code: \\mu, it shows up as an odd code. I'm new to these forums and have not been introduced to this character code.

Ah, yes, I believe you're right. I mis-read your post.

For LaTeX help, click on the [tex]\Sigma[/tex] to the right of the array of buttons when you're postion.

LowlyPion found our mistake (I made the same one you did...): We didn't include the effect of the applied force F on the normal force when we calculated the friction force. If you do that, you should get the right answer (the same one you'd get with LowlyPion's method).

-Kerry
 

FAQ: What Went Wrong in Solving the Energy Equation Problem?

What is the energy equation problem?

The energy equation problem is a mathematical representation of the conservation of energy principle, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. It involves solving for the unknown energy values in a given system, taking into account all sources and types of energy present.

Why is the energy equation problem important?

The energy equation problem is important because it allows us to accurately calculate and predict the behavior of energy in a given system. This is crucial in many fields of science, engineering, and technology, as it helps us understand and optimize energy usage, efficiency, and sustainability.

What are the key components of the energy equation problem?

The key components of the energy equation problem are the different forms of energy present in the system, such as kinetic, potential, thermal, and chemical energy. It also takes into account external factors, such as work done and heat transfer, that can affect the energy balance.

How do you solve the energy equation problem?

To solve the energy equation problem, you need to first identify all the sources and types of energy in the system and their respective values. Then, you can use the energy conservation principle to set up and solve equations to find the unknown energy values. This is typically done using algebraic manipulation and mathematical formulas.

What are some practical applications of the energy equation problem?

The energy equation problem has numerous practical applications in various fields, such as thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and electromagnetics. It is used to design and optimize energy systems, such as engines, power plants, and renewable energy technologies. It also plays a crucial role in understanding and predicting the behavior of natural phenomena, such as weather patterns and climate change.

Similar threads

Back
Top