- #36
- 19,572
- 10,377
Don't know, can you link me to this post?Frabjous said:Revisiting the beginning of the thread, how did someone get a negative score?
Don't know, can you link me to this post?Frabjous said:Revisiting the beginning of the thread, how did someone get a negative score?
I wasn’t really tracking the user. @Rive and I noticed to the same newbie post, so it was either Thursday night or Friday morning.Greg Bernhardt said:Don't know, can you link me to this post?
Happy to hear that!Greg Bernhardt said:Right, I was wrong, there is no negative emoji.
Can't recall the user name. Was removed from the end of the can-any-country-achieve-net-zero-without-nuclear topic.Greg Bernhardt said:Don't know, can you link me to this post?
That's correct. Basically, reacting with "sad" or "skeptical" has no effect on the reaction score.dextercioby said:So there is no way to lower the "reaction score" (which is basically a subjective user-impact score), but only to keep it constant by constantly (!) hitting "sad" and "skeptical" on some user's posts. Correct?
Yes. If I am correct, "Like", "Love", "Informative", "Care" and "Haha" increase the reaction score by 1. "Sad" and "Skeptical" have no effect.DaveC426913 said:Wait. Are you guys saying that reactions affect user scores?
No, see above.DaveC426913 said:When I use the skeptical emoji, I ding someone for a point?
You can get Trophies based on your reaction score. (See here, scroll down a bit.)DaveC426913 said:(Also, what do user scores do?)