A What’s the meaning of decay rate in optical Bloch equations?

wangvivi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
there is a parameter called decay rate(Γ or γ)in the optcial bloch equation or the equation of motion for the atomic probability amplitude.what‘s the meaning of it?
i have some questions about decay rate.
1:why do we need decay rate in these equations?
2:is it a constant for a specific medium?
3:it can be changed with respect to some conditions like temprature or pressure?
4:how can i know the decay rate of some energy levels in 85Rubidium
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hongqiaozhang said:
TL;DR Summary: there is a parameter called decay rate(Γ or γ)in the optcial bloch equation or the equation of motion for the atomic probability amplitude.what‘s the meaning of it?

i have some questions about decay rate.
1:why do we need decay rate in these equations?
2:is it a constant for a specific medium?
3:it can be changed with respect to some conditions like temprature or pressure?
4:how can i know the decay rate of some energy levels in 85Rubidium
##\gamma## describes spontaneous radiative decay between the two energy levels.

For quite detailed quantitative information on atoms, consult NIST Atomic Spectral Database.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top