Undergrad What's the significance of the phase in a coherent state?

Click For Summary
In a coherent state, the phase plays a crucial role, represented by α = |α| exp(iθ), linking the number operator and phase operator as conjugates. The significance of the phase is highlighted through the expectation values of position and momentum, where ⟨x⟩ is proportional to Re(α) and ⟨p⟩ is proportional to Im(α). This relationship leads to the equation ⟨p⟩ = mω⟨x⟩ tan(θ), establishing a connection between the expectations of position and momentum. The discussion also notes that α is time-dependent, emphasizing that coherent states are not energy eigenstates. Understanding these relationships enhances insights into quantum mechanics and phase space dynamics.
vancouver_water
Messages
76
Reaction score
10
In a coherent state defined by |\alpha\rangle = \exp{\left(-\frac{|\alpha|^2}{2}\right)}\exp{\left(\alpha \hat{a}^\dagger\right)} |0\rangle there is a definite phase associated with the state by \alpha = |\alpha| \exp{\left(i\theta\right)} where the number operator and phase operator are conjugates, -i\partial_{\theta} = \hat{n}. The meaning of the number operator is obvious but what is the significance of the phase in this state? What would be a consequence of picking a new phase for this state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the expectation value of x and p and you will see.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
So i get \langle x\rangle \propto \Re{(\alpha)} and \langle p \rangle \propto \Im{(\alpha)}. Which gives the relation \langle p \rangle = m\omega\langle x \rangle \tan\theta. So it gives the relation between expectations of x and p.
 
vancouver_water said:
So i get \langle x\rangle \propto \Re{(\alpha)} and \langle p \rangle \propto \Im{(\alpha)}. Which gives the relation \langle p \rangle = m\omega\langle x \rangle \tan\theta. So it gives the relation between expectations of x and p.
Yes. Are you familiar with the phase space from classical mechanics, or action-angle variables?
 
DrDu said:
Yes. Are you familiar with the phase space from classical mechanics, or action-angle variables?
With phase space yes, but not with action angle variables. I'll read about them though, Thanks!
 
Also take in mind that alpha is time dependent as coherent states aren't energy eigenstates.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K