When did you guys really start to understand linear algebra?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding linear algebra deeply involves grasping its abstract concepts beyond mere computations. Many learners find that a significant breakthrough occurs after a couple of months of study, where the focus shifts from procedural knowledge to comprehending the underlying principles. Key topics include vector spaces, bases, and linear transformations, which are foundational to the subject. Recognizing that linear algebra is fundamentally about the study of vectors and their representations as matrices is crucial. The geometric interpretation of these concepts, particularly in relation to physics, enhances comprehension. Engaging with vector analysis from a linear algebra perspective can be particularly rewarding, as it emphasizes the manipulation of geometric objects like lines and planes. This approach reveals the connections between linear operations and the creation of vector spaces, enriching the understanding of concepts such as linear combinations and the cross product. Overall, a rigorous mathematical perspective on these topics fosters creativity and applicability in both mathematics and physics.
bonfire09
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
When did you guys really start to understand linear algebra? Like you understood why it worked and how it works instead of just "how." What did you read or do to get to that point. Reason why I'm asking is I got 4 weeks off and I'd really want to get better with linear algebra. I took one semester of it and all I did was computations with some proofs which were easy though. I learned out of David Lay's book but I feel that I don't understand why I'm doing things like vector spaces, basis, and linear transformations. To make my point more clear I don't see the bigger picture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It took me maybe 2 months to understand the bigger picture, I know exactly what you mean. I realized that linear algebra is basically just the abstract study of vectors. Vectors can be represented as matrices, which have many different properties, etc.. The most important part (for physics) that I learned was actually part of my calculus II sequence, which included plane geometry.

I don't know if you've already gotten into vector analysis, but learning this subject from a linear algebra perspective is very rewarding. Learning the geometry and mathematical manipulation of objects such as lines and planes is crucial for physics. Applications and worth make themselves relevant here.Linear algebra, however, is still taught as pure mathematics subject. The pure math comes out in studying operations, particularly linear operations, on mathematical objects such as vectors and matrices. Since the fulfillment of all these operations creates a vector space, we can define an abstract set of functions or vectors on this "space". For example, we know that every vector in R3 can be represented as a linear combination of the 3 perpendicular unit vectors. This leads to the study of the cross product and how perpendicular vectors can be made or represented in the first place. Understanding concepts such as these, from a mathematically rigorous linear algebra perspective, helps give creativeness to the concept and can also be useful in physics (since we also use coordinate systems). It's very abstract, but it's pure math!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top