When Is the Superposition of These Plane Waves Zero?

In summary: That is why you should have kept the s term in your working.So you are saying that I should have done this16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2 = 16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38-24tx + 2 = 24tx - 48t - 36x + 384 = 48t + 36x - 24tx + 24tx - 24 = 48t + 36x - 26 = 48t + 36xThis is the same as3 =
  • #1
GreenPrint
1,196
0

Homework Statement



Two plane waves are given by

[itex]E_{1} = \frac{5E_{0}}{((3 \frac{1}{m})x - (4 \frac{1}{s})t)^{2} + 2}[/itex] and
[itex]E_{2} = -\frac{5E_{0}}{((3 \frac{1}{m})x + (4 \frac{1}{s})t)^{2} - 6}[/itex]

a) Describe the motion of the two waves.
b) At what instant is their superposition everywhere zero?
c) At what point is their superposition always zero?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


For part b)
[itex]E_{R} = E_{1} + E_{2} = 5E_{0}(\frac{1}{((3 \frac{1}{m})x - (4 \frac{1}{s})t)^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{((3 \frac{1}{m})x + (4 \frac{1}{s})t)^{2} - 6}) = 0[/itex]

Since I'm looking for the instant in which the superposition is zero I set x = 0 and solve for t

[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 36 + 2} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 38} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} = \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 38}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{16t^{2} - 48t + 38}{16t^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]
[itex]16t^{2} - 48t + 38 = 0[/itex]
This provides me with an imaginary time. I'm not exactly sure what it is I'm doing wrong here. Thanks for any help you can provide me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
x is not the superposition of the waves here. It is just the spatial coordinate or position.
 
  • #3
So how would I go about solving the problem then?
 
  • #4
Keep the x in your expression for the resultant amplitude and see if you can find some sort of simplified expression for t.
Why did the s term disappear in your working?
 
  • #5
I thought that the [itex]\frac{1}{s}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{1}{m}[/itex] where units? So I removed them to make my expressions less messy. When I leave x and t in the expression and solve I get

[itex]\frac{16t^{2} - 24tx + 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]

I'm not sure how that really helps or how I'm supposed to simplify this further. Thanks for the help.
 
  • #6
I'm not sure how to solve this. Someone else may have to help. In your original solution you can multiply both sides by the denominator of the LHS to get a real time but I still don't think setting x=0 is the right thing to do.

GreenPrint said:
Since I'm looking for the instant in which the superposition is zero I set x = 0 and solve for t

[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 36 + 2} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 38} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} + 2} = \frac{1}{16t^{2} - 48t + 38}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{16t^{2} - 48t + 38}{16t^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]

This provides me with an imaginary time. I'm not exactly sure what it is I'm doing wrong here. Thanks for any help you can provide me.
 
  • #7
GreenPrint said:
I thought that the [itex]\frac{1}{s}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{1}{m}[/itex] where units? So I removed them to make my expressions less messy. When I leave x and t in the expression and solve I get

[itex]\frac{16t^{2} - 24tx + 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]

I'm not sure how that really helps or how I'm supposed to simplify this further. Thanks for the help.

When I leave x in I do get a neat answer (although I'm not sure if it answers the question). Try the algebra again and if you reach a point similar to this again - multiply by the denominator.
 
  • #8
I start off with this
[itex]E = E_{1} + E_{2} = \frac{5E_{0}}{(3x - 4t)^{2} + 2} - \frac{5E_{0}}{(3x + 4t - 6)^{2} + 2} = 0[/itex]
I factor
[itex]E = E_{1} + E_{2} = 5E_{0}(\frac{1}{(3x - 4t)^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{(3x + 4t - 6)^{2} + 2} = 0[/itex]
I expand
[itex]5E_{0}(\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}) = 0[/itex]
simplify
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38} = 0[/itex]
move second term to right hand side
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}[/itex]
multiply both sides by the denominator of the RHS term
[itex]\frac{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]
I set the numerator equal to zero
[itex]16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38 = 0[/itex]

And from here it doesn't look like I can solve for a real answer. I don't see what it is I'm doing wrong here.

The back of my book says that the answer is
[itex]t = \frac{3}{4} s[/itex]

I find it interesting that

[itex]|\frac{∂(16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38)}{∂t}| = \frac{3}{4}[/itex]

I'm not sure if this is just a coincidence or not though.
 
  • #9
Looking at your first line you have a -6 inside the squared brackets. This is not what you showed originally. Did you make a mistake in your first post?
 
  • #10
You must have written it wrong originally as it now works.

GreenPrint said:
I start off with this
[itex]E = E_{1} + E_{2} = \frac{5E_{0}}{(3x - 4t)^{2} + 2} - \frac{5E_{0}}{(3x + 4t - 6)^{2} + 2} = 0[/itex]
I factor
[itex]E = E_{1} + E_{2} = 5E_{0}(\frac{1}{(3x - 4t)^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{(3x + 4t - 6)^{2} + 2} = 0[/itex]
I expand
[itex]5E_{0}(\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}) = 0[/itex]
simplify
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} - \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38} = 0[/itex]
move second term to right hand side
[itex]\frac{1}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = \frac{1}{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}[/itex]
multiply both sides by the denominator of the RHS term
[itex]\frac{16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38}{16t^{2} - 24tx + 9x^{2} + 2} = 1[/itex]
I set the numerator equal to zero
[itex]16t^{2} + 24tx - 48t + 9x^{2} - 36x + 38 = 0[/itex]

And from here it doesn't look like I can solve for a real answer. I don't see what it is I'm doing wrong here.

Setting the numerator to zero is wrong. You have already set the displacement to zero at the start so now you just need to solve it as it appears. Remember what I said to do earlier when you reached a point like this?
 
  • #11
You don't need to do all this common denominator thing.

As the two fractions have the same numerator (Eo) it is sufficient to equate their denominators in order to have zero amplitude.
 

FAQ: When Is the Superposition of These Plane Waves Zero?

What is superposition in wave equations?

In wave equations, superposition refers to the principle that states when two or more waves meet at a point, the resulting wave is the sum of the individual waves.

How does superposition affect the behavior of waves?

Superposition allows for the interference of waves, which can result in constructive or destructive interference depending on the phase relationship between the waves. This affects the amplitude and frequency of the resulting wave.

Can superposition be applied to all types of waves?

Yes, superposition can be applied to all types of waves, including electromagnetic waves, sound waves, and water waves.

What is the mathematical representation of superposition in wave equations?

In mathematical terms, superposition is represented as the addition or subtraction of wave amplitudes at a given point in space and time.

How is superposition used in practical applications?

Superposition is used in many practical applications, such as in noise-cancelling headphones, where sound waves are combined to cancel out background noise. It is also used in medical imaging, such as MRI, to create 3D images of the body by combining multiple waves.

Back
Top