When to use quadratic equations?

In summary: Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?Consider how you could calculate her velocity when her feet touch the water.To the OP:You know the position ## y ## where her feet are as they touch the water, i.e. basically you know ## y_{water}-y_{initial} ##.What equation might work best, given that information?
  • #1
struggtofunc
15
1
Hello everyone! Apologies if this is a very repetitive question but I have gone through previous forum posts and am still struggling to understand how to identify which equations are appropriate. In the problem below, I have used the kinematic equation of "v = v(i) + at" but my answer is incorrect. Rather, I was told to use a quadratic equation. My question is, what determines whether to use a quadratic equation of not? I was under the impression that because I had the values of v(i), v, and a, that i could simply use the kinematic equation. Why would this be incorrect?

Again, I'm very sorry if I have posted this incorrectly. Any help would be much appreciated!

Thank you very much!

J

1. Homework Statement

A swimmer bounces straight up from a diving board and falls feet first into a pool. She starts with a velocity of 4.00 m/s, and her takeoff point is 1.80 m above the pool. (a) How long are her feet in the air?

y(i)=1.80m
y = 0m
a = -9.8 ms-2
v(i) = 4.00 ms-1

Homework Equations


y-y(i) = v(i)t + (1/2)(a)(t^2)
or
v = v(i) + at

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the equation v = v(i) + at and calculated the answer as:

0 = 4.00 + (-9.8)(t)

t = (-4.00)/(-9.8)
t = 0.408 seconds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
struggtofunc said:
Hello everyone! Apologies if this is a very repetitive question but I have gone through previous forum posts and am still struggling to understand how to identify which equations are appropriate. In the problem below, I have used the kinematic equation of "v = v(i) + at" but my answer is incorrect. Rather, I was told to use a quadratic equation. My question is, what determines whether to use a quadratic equation of not? I was under the impression that because I had the values of v(i), v, and a, that i could simply use the kinematic equation. Why would this be incorrect?

Again, I'm very sorry if I have posted this incorrectly. Any help would be much appreciated!

Thank you very much!

J

1. Homework Statement

A swimmer bounces straight up from a diving board and falls feet first into a pool. She starts with a velocity of 4.00 m/s, and her takeoff point is 1.80 m above the pool. (a) How long are her feet in the air?

y(i)=1.80m
y = 0m
a = -9.8 ms-2
v(i) = 4.00 ms-1

Homework Equations


y-y(i) = v(i)t + (1/2)(a)(t^2)
or
v = v(i) + at

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the equation v = v(i) + at and calculated the answer as:

0 = 4.00 + (-9.8)(t)

t = (-4.00)/(-9.8)
t = 0.408 seconds
You have calculated the time for her to reach zero vertical speed. At what speed does she enter the pool?
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #3
Thanks for your reply! I think I see the problem now. So because the question is asking for time in the air, my V(f) value should be calculated just before she reaches rest. Thankyou!
 
  • #4
tnich said:
You have calculated the time for her to reach zero vertical speed. At what speed does she enter the pool?

In other words, you have calculated the time after which she is at the highest point. Now you have to add the time it takes to fall down into the pool.

struggtofunc said:
Thanks for your reply! I think I see the problem now. So because the question is asking for time in the air, my V(f) value should be calculated just before she reaches rest. Thankyou!

she won't be at rest when she hits the water. she'll be at her highest speed just before she hits the water.
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #5
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?
 
  • #6
struggtofunc said:
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?
Consider how you could calculate her velocity when her feet touch the water.
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #7
To the OP: You know the position ## y ## where her feet are as they touch the water, i.e. basically you know ## y_{water}-y_{initial} ##. What equation might work best, given that information?
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #8
tnich said:
Consider how you could calculate her velocity when her feet touch the water.
I think it would be much easier to use the other equation.
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #9
Thanks for all the help everyone!

I've calculated the time using two equations rather than quadratics:

v^2 = v(i)^2 + 2a(x-x(i))
v^2 = (4.00)^2 + 2(-9.8)(-1.80)

v = square root of 51.28 = +- 7.16 ms-1

v = v(i) + at
t = (+-7.16 - 4.00)/(-9.8)
t = - 0.32 s
t = 1.14 s

Thank you all so much! J
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #10
struggtofunc said:
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?

it could certainly be done in more than one step. However, now that you have the time it takes to get up to the highest point of her jump you'd need to calculate how high she's up in the air. you need the information to calculate the time it takes to fall from this height, given that the speed at this point is 0 m/s.

you could use the exact same equation to calculate it all in one step. with initial height that of the board and initial velocity when she jumps off the board.
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc
  • #11
Suggestion is to use the distance equation that is quadratic in time, especially if you haven't had much practice with quadratic equations. It's a good way to get practice with solving a quadratic equation. I didn't check your answer yet using the method that you used, but you should get the same answer using the distance equation ## y-y_i=v_i t +(\frac{1}{2})at^2 ##. ## \\ ## Editing: I have now checked your solution, and it is correct. And I also got the same answer using the above distance equation.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
struggtofunc said:
Thanks for all the help everyone!

I've calculated the time using two equations rather than quadratics:

v^2 = v(i)^2 + 2a(x-x(i))
v^2 = (4.00)^2 + 2(-9.8)(-1.80)

v = square root of 51.28 = +- 7.16 ms-1

v = v(i) + at
t = (+-7.16 - 4.00)/(-9.8)
t = - 0.32 s
t = 1.14 s

Thank you all so much! J
I can't see any fault with that. You have done exactly the same calculations that would have been required to solve the quadratic.
 
  • Like
Likes struggtofunc and Charles Link

FAQ: When to use quadratic equations?

When should I use a quadratic equation?

Quadratic equations are typically used to solve problems related to finding the maximum or minimum value of a function, such as in optimization or physics problems. They can also be used to solve problems involving projectile motion, area and perimeter, and finding the roots of a polynomial function.

How do I know when to use the quadratic formula?

The quadratic formula is used when solving a quadratic equation in the form of ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a, b, and c are constants. It is used when the equation cannot be easily factored or when the roots of the equation are not rational numbers.

Can I use a quadratic equation to solve any problem with a quadratic relationship?

No, quadratic equations can only be used to solve problems where the relationship between the variables is quadratic. This means that the highest power of the variable in the equation must be 2. If the relationship is not quadratic, then a different method or equation must be used.

How do I determine if a problem can be solved using a quadratic equation?

To determine if a problem can be solved using a quadratic equation, you can look for keywords such as "maximum" or "minimum," "area" or "perimeter," and "roots" or "zeros" in the problem. These can be indicators that a quadratic equation may be necessary to solve the problem.

Can I use a quadratic equation to solve real-life problems?

Yes, quadratic equations can be used to solve real-life problems such as finding the optimal shape for a container, predicting the trajectory of a projectile, or determining the dimensions of a garden with a given area. They are a useful tool in many fields, including engineering, physics, and economics.

Back
Top