Where Did My Integration by Parts Go Wrong?

In summary, the conversation discusses solving a differential equation using integration by parts. The process involves using an integrating factor and transforming the trigonometric function into its complex form. There is also a discussion on consistency when choosing u and dv in the integration by parts process.
  • #1
Somefantastik
230
0
x' = -2x + cos(t)

dx/dt + 2x = cos(t)

integrating factor = e^2t =>

[tex] e^{2t} \ \frac{dx}{dt} \ + 2 \ e^{2t} \ x \ = \ e^{2t} \cos(t) => [/tex]

[tex] \int \frac{d}{dt}\left(e^{2t} \ x \right) \ = \ \int e^{2t}\cos(t)\ dt => [/tex]

[tex]
e^{2t}x = \int e^{2t}cos(t) \ dt = \frac{1}{2}cos(t) \ e^{2t} + \frac{1}{2}\int e^{2t}sin(t)\ dt = \frac{1}{2}cos(t)\ e^{2t} + \frac{1}{2}\left(-e^{2t}cos(t) + 2\int cos(t)\ e^{2t} \right) = \frac{1}{2}cos(t) \e^{2t} - \frac{1}{2}cos(t) \ e^{2t} + 2\int cos(t)\ e^{2t} dt \ =>
[/tex]

[tex] \int e^{2t} / cos(t) / dt = 0 + 2 \int cos(t) / e^{2t} / dt => [/tex]

?? My integration must have gone wrong somewhere. Any explanations?

I was shown on an earlier thread how to transform the trig function into its complex form and solve that way, and the answer that resulted was that which agreed with good ole MATLAB : (1/5)*(2*cos(t) + sin(t)).

I'm grateful to be shown how to do this by using the transform, but my overwhelming curiosity pushes me to have this shown to me using integration by parts. I'm more likely to use that method on an exam. Any takers?

Thanks,
Candio
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex]\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt[/tex]
Let u= e2t, dv= cos(t)dt.
Then du= 2e2tdt, v= sin(t)
[tex]\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt= e^{2t}sin(t)- 2\int e^{2t}sin(t)dt[/tex]
To do that second integral, let u= e2t, dv= sin(t)dt.
Then du= 2e2t, v= -cos(t)dt
[tex]\int e^{2t}sin(t)dt= -e^{2t}cos(t)+ 2\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt[/tex]

Putting that into the previous integral,
[tex]\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt= e^{2t}sin(t)- 2(-e{2t}cos(t)+ 2\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt)[/tex]
[tex]\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt= e^{2t}sin(t)+ 2e^{2t}cos(t)- 4\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt[/tex]

Now add [itex]4\int e^{2t}cos(t)dt[/itex] to both sides of the equation.
 
  • #3
Ok thanks so much. When you have the type of int. by parts where you integrate by parts twice, must you be consistent when choosing u, dv?
 
  • #4
Oh yes! If you switch in the middle, you will just reverse what you did the first time and everything will cancel!
 
  • #5
oh my goodness :(

thank you so much.
 

FAQ: Where Did My Integration by Parts Go Wrong?

What is an ODE?

An ODE (ordinary differential equation) is a mathematical equation that describes how a variable changes over time, based on its current value and rate of change.

What does it mean to have trouble at an integration step?

Having trouble at an integration step means that when attempting to solve an ODE using numerical methods, there was an issue with calculating the next step in the solution. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as an incorrect numerical method being used or the ODE being difficult to solve accurately.

How can I troubleshoot ODE integration step issues?

If you are experiencing trouble at an integration step, you can try using a different numerical method, adjusting the step size, or checking for errors in your ODE formulation. You can also consult with other experts or references for guidance.

What are some common causes of ODE integration step problems?

Some common causes of ODE integration step problems include using an incorrect or unstable numerical method, having a poorly defined or difficult to solve ODE, or not properly handling boundary or initial conditions.

How important is accurate integration for ODE solutions?

Accurate integration is crucial for obtaining reliable and meaningful solutions for ODEs. Inaccurate integration can lead to incorrect solutions, making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions or make predictions based on the ODE model.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top