Where is the centre of mass for a flat sheet of metal bounded by y=x^4 and y=5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TobyDarkeness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centre of mass Mass
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the center of mass for a flat sheet of metal bounded by the curves y=x^4 and y=5. Participants emphasize the importance of setting up the correct double integral to find the center of mass, particularly when dealing with areas above the curve. There is confusion regarding the appropriate limits of integration and the necessity of using a double integral for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the symmetry of the problem, suggesting that the x-coordinate of the center of mass will be at the origin due to the nature of the functions involved. Ultimately, the correct approach involves integrating with respect to both x and y to find the center of mass accurately.
TobyDarkeness
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



determine the position of the centre of mass of a flat sheet of metal of homogeneous density rho. The sheet lies within the area bounded by the equations y=x^4 and y=5

Homework Equations


integral centre mass


The Attempt at a Solution


a slightly trivial question, i know how to set up the correct integral when finding the centre of mass below the function curve bound by an x=? but with the area above the curve in this manner I am finding problems. Should i treat the graph on its side or change the graph form to fit in the other direction. or find the integrals below both functions and do a subtraction to find the positions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TobyDarkeness said:

Homework Statement



determine the position of the centre of mass of a flat sheet of metal of homogeneous density rho. The sheet lies within the area bounded by the equations y=x^4 and y=5

Homework Equations


integral centre mass


The Attempt at a Solution


a slightly trivial question, i know how to set up the correct integral when finding the centre of mass below the function curve bound by an x=? but with the area above the curve in this manner I am finding problems. Should i treat the graph on its side or change the graph form to fit in the other direction. or find the integrals below both functions and do a subtraction to find the positions?

First, draw a picture!

Then either divide the area into horizontal slices of thickness dy, express the length of a slice at a give height y as a function of y and integrate, or divide it into veritical slices of width dx, express the height of a slice at a given x as a function of x and integrate.
 
thats the method I am used to, on which I've found simple enough with other examples but i can't seem to build the correct integral with this set up.
 
TobyDarkeness said:
thats the method I am used to, on which I've found simple enough with other examples but i can't seem to build the correct integral with this set up.

Show your attempt.
 
ok so I am not sure how to integrate for the area above the line, so here's my attempt.
i don't have a scanner so i don't have a diagram to show you. I turned the graph on its side and reversed the axis (tried to cheat a bit here) so my x co ords would be my y.

y=x^4, y=5

switching it, x=4th root (y) and x=5 but where i have "y" its my new x axis.

so using this i did the integration for the horizontal position as normal,
[integral xydx]/[integralydx]
doing this i get 5 as my horizontal co-ord which is actually my vertical since i switched it, here i can already see I've gone wrong. but i followed through with the vertical anyway and obtained 0.66 as my other position.

i made a second attempt with the limits +/- 4th root 5, integrating first y=5 then y=x^4 in both x and y directions then subtracting one from the other to find the positions in the area bounded. but i can see already from the first integration that this is also wrong.

how do i obtain the position of the centre of mass in this bounded area above the function line??

thanks in advance.
 
TobyDarkeness said:
so using this i did the integration for the horizontal position as normal,
[integral xydx]/[integralydx]
doing this i get 5 as my horizontal co-ord which is actually my vertical since i switched it, here i can already see I've gone wrong. but i followed through with the vertical anyway and obtained 0.66 as my other position.

What were your limits of integration?
 
for this attempt i used 5, 0 as my limits treating the y=5 as x=5 bound by the 4th root curve and the origin.
 
TobyDarkeness said:
for this attempt i used 5, 0 as my limits treating the y=5 as x=5 bound by the 4th root curve and the origin.

Your problem is that the length of each ribbon with thickness dx isn't just y, you need to use a double integral. For the area of the region, you should have

A=\int_0^5 \int_{-x^{1/4}}^{x^{1/4}}dydx

Do you see why?

For the horizontal and vertical positions of the CoM, you just insert either x or y (and rho) into that double integral and then divide by the area.
 
sorry i think I am missing something can you explain why i need to use the double integral, I've not been working for a long time now my maths is rusty. so i need to use the double integral but in the same way with the surface area density process, for the area should i sub in for y, y=x^4 as normal you should i do an integral subtraction to get the area of the enclosed space.
 
  • #10
rho=m/A, so then dm=rho*dA, which means that
m=\int \int \rho dA

then

x_{cm}=\frac{\int \int \rho x dA}{m}

and

y_{cm}=\frac{\int \int \rho y dA}{m}

Oh yeah, and hint: before you even start, what should x_cm be?
 
  • #11
should there be a integral on the bottom as well? \intdm? by xcm do you mean the limits of integration for the x position or should i be able to intuitively understand where the x position should be? at a guess i would say the origin on the axis, and therefore do i need to only calculate the y position?
 
  • #12
Yes, exactly, intuitively you should be able to guess that the x_cm will be on the axis, and mathematically you see it very soon because you are integrating an odd function over symmetric bounds.

There is an integral on the bottom, yes, it's the integral for m I have at the beginning of my post.

Oh yeah, and also you don't have to do the exact integral that gabba posted, you could integrate with respect to x first if you really wanted. You'd have to do slightly more work to get the right x bounds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K