B Where is the error in my reasoning about palindromes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the probability of forming palindromes with two and three letters. The original poster mistakenly believes that two-letter palindromes are less likely due to needing the same letter in both positions, resulting in 26 possibilities. However, the reasoning fails to account for the total number of combinations for three-letter words, which includes a middle letter that does not affect the palindrome structure. The key point is that while there are 26 two-letter palindromes, the probability calculations for three-letter palindromes need to consider the total combinations of letters accurately. Understanding the relationship between the number of palindromic combinations and total letter combinations clarifies the error in reasoning.
red65
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1672170106596.png

Hello everyone, I found this problem online about probability, for me, I think that to have a 2 letter palindrome is less likely because we need to have the same letter in the 2 places which gives us 26 possibilities (aa , bb, cc ....) however for words with 3 letters we have 26 possibilities for the first and the last letter times 26 possibilities for the letter in the middle (aaa,aba,aca....) unfortunately my answer is wrong, can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
red65 said:
Hello everyone, I found this problem online about probability, for me, I think that to have a 2 letter palindrome is less likely because we need to have the same letter in the 2 places which gives us 26 possibilities (aa , bb, cc ....) however for words with 3 letters we have 26 possibilities for the first and the last letter times 26 possibilities for the letter in the middle (aaa,aba,aca....) unfortunately my answer is wrong, can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
thanks!
Not all possibilities are equally likely. In particular, ##aa## is 26 times more likely than ##aaa##. But ##aa## has the same likelihood as ##a*a##, where ##*## is any letter.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes malawi_glenn and red65
The middle letteer doesn't matter (3 letter word). Drop it and get the same as 2 letter word.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
red65 said:
can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
For 2 letter words you are right that there are 26 possibilities so we have ## P(\text{palindrome}) = \frac{26}{Y} ##. What is Y? For 3 letter words you are right that the number on the top is 26 x 26, but what is the number on the bottom?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and FactChecker
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top