Where is the error in this argument

In summary, the conversation discusses the logarithmic properties of imaginary numbers, specifically showing that the argument for (sqrt(i))^4 can also be applied to (sqrt(-i))^4. This highlights the importance of considering all possible arguments when dealing with complex numbers.
  • #1
Bachelier
376
0
It is possible to do this and it is correct:

[tex]
\log \left[\sqrt{i}\right] = \log\left\{\exp\left[\frac{i}{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}+2\pi n\right)\right]\right\} = \frac{i}{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi n\right) = i\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \pi n\right)
[/tex]

But:

[tex]
\log \left[i^2 \right] = \log\left\{\exp\left[2i \left(\frac{\pi}{2}+2\pi n\right)\right]\right\} = 2i \left(\frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi n\right) = i\left(\pi + 4\pi n\right)
[/tex]

yet

## \log \left[i^2 \right] = \log \left[-1 \right] = i\left(\pi + 2\pi n\right) \ for \ k \in \mathbb{Z}## which is the correct argument.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bachelier said:
It is possible to do this and it is correct:

[tex]
\log \left[\sqrt{i}\right] = \log\left\{\exp\left[\frac{i}{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}+2\pi n\right)\right]\right\} = \frac{i}{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi n\right) = i\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \pi n\right)
[/tex]

But:

[tex]
\log \left[i^2 \right] = \log\left\{\exp\left[2i \left(\frac{\pi}{2}+2\pi n\right)\right]\right\} = 2i \left(\frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi n\right) = i\left(\pi + 4\pi n\right)
[/tex]

yet

## \log \left[i^2 \right] = \log \left[-1 \right] = i\left(\pi + 2\pi n\right) \ for \ k \in \mathbb{Z}## which is the correct argument.

I'm not sure what your argument really is. Sure (sqrt(i))^4=(i)^2=(-1). (sqrt(-i))^4 is also (-1). So?
 

FAQ: Where is the error in this argument

What is the purpose of finding the error in an argument?

Finding the error in an argument allows us to identify flaws in reasoning and improve the validity of the argument. It also helps us to understand the different perspectives and potential biases that can influence the argument.

How do you determine where the error is in an argument?

To determine where the error is in an argument, you need to carefully examine the premises, evidence, and logical connections between them. Look for any gaps, contradictions, or faulty assumptions in the reasoning.

Can an argument have multiple errors?

Yes, an argument can have multiple errors. A single error in reasoning can lead to multiple errors in the overall argument. Therefore, it is important to carefully evaluate each component of the argument to identify and correct all errors.

What are some common types of errors in arguments?

Some common types of errors in arguments include logical fallacies, faulty assumptions, circular reasoning, and biased evidence. These errors can undermine the validity and reliability of the argument.

Can an argument with an error still be valid?

No, an argument with an error cannot be considered valid. In order for an argument to be valid, it must have a sound logical structure and be supported by accurate and unbiased evidence. Errors in an argument can weaken or invalidate its overall validity.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
985
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top