Which Definition of Physical Quantity is Clearer and More Accurate?

  • Thread starter johncena
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Definition
In summary, a physical quantity is a quantifiable physical property that can be measured and calculated. It is not limited to matter, as even energy can be quantified as a physical quantity. However, the definition of "physical" and "measurement" need to be clearly defined in order to accurately determine what is considered a physical quantity.
  • #1
johncena
131
1
Which definition is more clear and correct ?
1)Any thing that has a measurement is called a physical quantity.
2)Characteristics that can be given to a matter is called physical quantity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
johncena said:
Which definition is more clear and correct ?
1)Any thing that has a measurement is called a physical quantity.
2)Characteristics that can be given to a matter is called physical quantity.
I would say that neither are correct. A physical quantity can not only be measured, but also calculated. And a photon is not matter, but has several physical quantities.
 
  • #3
What about this one ?
Any thing that has a measurement and can be expressed in the form of a number is called physical quantity.
 
  • #4
Eh, in my opinion, both are highly unclear and imprecise definitions...though I'll pick 1) if I had no choice. A physical quantity would be a physical property that, as its name suggests, is quantifiable. "Anything" is a terribly vague term, as is "measurement".
As for 2), "Characteristics" is too broad and sweeping a term - colour for example is most definitely not a physical quantity.
 
  • #5
johncena said:
What about this one ?
Any thing that has a measurement and can be expressed in the form of a number is called physical quantity.
Again, what about calculating a physical quantity? And you need to define 'measurement', before you can use it.
 
  • #6
Hootenanny said:
a photon is not matter, but has several physical quantities.

Why photon is not considered as matter?
 
  • #7
johncena said:
Why photon is not considered as matter?

well its more accurate to consider it as a packet of energy, keeping in mind matter can be turned to energy and vice versa , i think 'physical' itself should be defined , maybe even some criteria to differentiate physical from non-physical.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Which Definition of Physical Quantity is Clearer and More Accurate?

How is clarity defined in scientific research?

Clarity in scientific research is typically defined as the ability of a concept, theory, or statement to be easily understood and comprehended by others.

What factors contribute to the clarity of a definition?

Factors that contribute to the clarity of a definition include the use of precise and specific language, the absence of ambiguity or vagueness, and the inclusion of relevant and accurate information.

Is one definition considered more clear than another?

In scientific research, the clarity of a definition is often subjective and can vary depending on the audience and purpose. However, a well-written and concise definition is generally considered more clear than a lengthy and convoluted one.

How can I improve the clarity of my own definitions?

To improve the clarity of your definitions, it is important to carefully consider the audience and purpose of your research. Use precise and specific language, avoid unnecessary jargon, and provide clear and concise explanations.

Can clarity be measured objectively?

While there are some tools and methods for evaluating the clarity of a definition, such as readability tests and expert reviews, it is ultimately a subjective measure and can vary depending on individual interpretations.

Similar threads

Back
Top